<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun_atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.6312-</id>
  <updated>2008-08-03T16:53:32Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for You airplane geeks are no fun...</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.6312</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6312" title="You airplane geeks are no fun..." />
    <published>2006-08-28T11:23:46Z</published>
    <updated>2006-11-11T16:53:39Z</updated>
    <title>You airplane geeks are no fun...</title>
    <summary> Yep, it&apos;s an R/C aircraft. Heh. With you guys, I&apos;m going to have to resort to posting pictures of the hydraulics in a small corner of a landing gear bay to give you any challenge at all... Oh, and JTG, take a look - there *is* a hint of the geodetic structure in there. But mostly not, as you observed. Perhaps not *quite* as obvious as this one... And for those who&apos;d like to see a Fleet Air Arm paint scheme......</summary>
    <author>
      <name>The Armorer</name>
      <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Aircraft" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.fototime.com/7F3812290762108/orig.jpg" border=0 alt="Hosting provided by FotoTime"></p>

<p>Yep, it's an R/C aircraft.  Heh.  With you guys, I'm going to have to resort to posting pictures of the hydraulics in a small corner of a landing gear bay to give you any challenge at all...</p>

<p>Oh, and JTG, take a look - there *is* a hint of the geodetic structure in there.  But mostly not, as you observed.</p>

<p>Perhaps not *quite* as <b><a href="http://www.divetheworld.com/Diving/warbirds/Wellington/index.htm">obvious as this one...</a></b></p>

<p>And for those who'd like to see a <b><a href="http://www.fleetairarmarchive.net/aircraft/Wellington.htm">Fleet Air Arm paint scheme</a></b>...</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.6312-comment:49773</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.6312" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html#comment-49773" />
    <title>Comment from CDR Salamander on 2006-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>CDR Salamander</name>
        <uri>http://cdrsalamander.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://cdrsalamander.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[I like <a href="http://www.teambanana.co.uk/b52rob.wmv" rel="nofollow">this</a> better....but, sadly, it does remind me of <a href="http://media.putfile.com/b52-crash" rel="nofollow">this</a>.]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-08-28T21:22:01Z</published>
    <updated>2006-08-28T21:22:01Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.6312-comment:49769</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.6312" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html#comment-49769" />
    <title>Comment from Casey Tompkins on 2006-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Casey Tompkins</name>
        <uri>http://www.thegantry.net/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog">
        Aha! I see I mixed up CC paint schemes with US Navy schemes. 

I&apos;m not sure the geodetic framework is all that clear in medium to far shot; most of the photos I&apos;ve seen (where it&apos;s apparent) are fairly close-in, and/or show the clear panels on the fuselage over the wings. 

At least I&apos;m assuming they&apos;re clear panels; I&apos;ve seen them in quite a few shots, and I can&apos;t imagine the RAF leaving great big holes in the side of the bomber... :)

It is a very nice model. Reminds me of that turbine-engined RC B-52 which crashed a while back. You see that thing airborne in a film clip and it&apos;s quite convincing.

    </content>
    <published>2006-08-28T18:31:56Z</published>
    <updated>2006-08-28T18:31:56Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.6312-comment:49761</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.6312" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html#comment-49761" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        Well, d-uh, me!

S&apos;okay, I&apos;m working on one for you guys!
    </content>
    <published>2006-08-28T14:33:50Z</published>
    <updated>2006-08-28T14:33:50Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.6312-comment:49758</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.6312" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/you_airplane_geeks_are_no_fun.html#comment-49758" />
    <title>Comment from wolfwalker on 2006-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>wolfwalker</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<i>You airplane geeks are no fun...</i>

Now would that be meanin' fun for you, or fun for us?  [chuckle.wav]
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-08-28T14:12:37Z</published>
    <updated>2006-08-28T14:12:37Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
</feed>

