<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Lazy Sunday fun...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:53:42 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Lazy Sunday fun...</title>
            <description>What&apos;s the most interesting thing about this picture to you?...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:45:11 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2006-08-28</title>
            <description>
                Hey- I didn&apos;t say it was historically incorrect... just that it&apos;s WRONG, WRONG, WRONG to have a &quot;hit me here&quot; target painted on.  Wacko Euro&apos;s....
:-)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49754</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49754</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:34:56 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MajMike on 2006-08-28</title>
            <description>
                there&apos;s some kind of dangly thingie looking like a frayed wire appearing just fwd of the right side wing.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49751</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49751</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:25:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-08-28</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<i>It's got a flippin' "target" sign on it. Who in their right mind would fly a plane with a 'HIT ME HERE' sign on the a$$ end.</i>

Hee!  That's *most* of Europe.

And the US during WWI.

You airplane geeks are no fun. Yep, it's a large-scale R/C.  ]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49747</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49747</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 06:23:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2006-08-28</title>
            <description>
                It&apos;s a model. There&apos;s no sign of the geodetic structure under the fabric which the full-size one had. The thing is entirely too smooth.

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49745</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49745</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:51:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Heartless Libertarian on 2006-08-27</title>
            <description>
                The only pics I&apos;ve seen of CC aircraft were Short Sunderlands, but they had white underbodies.  I&apos;d assume any other aircraft would use a similar paint scheme.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49743</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49743</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:34:49 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2006-08-27</title>
            <description>
                I don&apos;t see a second engine on the other wing.

How&apos;s this thing flying?  LOL

(okay, I realize that is probably a trick of the photo, but it is interesting)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49742</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49742</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:03:53 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2006-08-27</title>
            <description>
                It&apos;s got a flippin&apos; &quot;target&quot; sign on it.  Who in their right mind would fly a plane with a &apos;HIT ME HERE&apos; sign on the a$$ end.
feh
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49741</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49741</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:51:39 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Casey Tompkins on 2006-08-27</title>
            <description>
                Hmmm. An aircraft with a night-bomber paint job flying during the day? :) Or is that a Costal Command paint job? 

I never read up on the CC paint jobs, although I know the Empire had an extensive anti-submarine aviation patrol running during the war.

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49736</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49736</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:18:45 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-08-27</title>
            <description>
                The window is to... look out.  The guys in front and back are to shoot at bad guys attacking from the front or back, and the pilots, well, I&apos;m not sure about the Wimpy, but they might have had a door they could get to, or, like a lot of the rest of the crew, they would get out through the bomb bay (this is assuming you&apos;re talking about needing to escape a shot-up aircraft).
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49735</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49735</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:39:23 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Trias on 2006-08-27</title>
            <description>
                Not much.  I am wondering how the pilot gets out and what the window is for.  The wing has the flat bit at the front rather than the back.  Then there the guy right at the back.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49733</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49733</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:36:30 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Doug K on 2006-08-27</title>
            <description>
                If it&apos;s John Greenfield&apos;s &quot;Ghost Squadron&quot; very large RC aircraft, the markings have been changed. I don&apos;t think there&apos;s a real one flying...wicked complex fuselage construction method. There is a nicely restored one, but not flyable, I don&apos;t believe.

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49732</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49732</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:26:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from wolfwalker on 2006-08-27</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The tricolor flag on the vertical stabilizer appears to be a standard RAF marking, judging from the pictures in a couple of my reference books.  I <i>think</i> you can tell some subtle and interesting things from the exact design of the rondel, but I'm not sure of that.  

My first thought: If that's a vintage photograph, it's pretty high quality for 194x.  If it's a recent photo of a vintage warbird, then I'm surprised to find there's still a Wellington flying.    

<i>Really</i> startling is that it has the same letters (Q-VR) as the one illustrated in <i>Fighters and Bombers of World War II</i>, so it's either the same airplane or it's been painted to match.  Incidentally, said airplane is identified in the book text as belonging to an RCAF squadron.  

Why no high-quality version of the image?  Did you not get one, or would it be a giveaway?  ;-)

Overall it looks just a little too clean and smooth for a warbird, so I'm going to guess it's an RC model.  

]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49731</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49731</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:32:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Rod Thorsen on 2006-08-27</title>
            <description>
                Pink panther in the rear turret, is this a model?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49726</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49726</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:50:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Tbird on 2006-08-27</title>
            <description>
                What&apos;s interesting, particularly if it&apos;s flying over England, is that there&apos;s not a cloud in the sky.  Normally, there would be clouds, rain, fog, snow, mist or various combinations of such. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49724</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49724</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:42:06 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Doug K on 2006-08-27</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Hmmmm....nose blister doesn't look right for a Wellington. Also, it appears to have a British roundel but maybe French colors on the vert. stab. (Hard to tell on that <b>odd color </b>and with my color vision.

Only real flyable Wellington? Is it 1:1 or RC?
]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49723</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/lazy_sunday_fun.html#comment-49723</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:13:53 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

