<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Excalibur...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/excalibur.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/excalibur_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:49:15 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Excalibur...</title>
            <description>A press release detailing the Army&apos;s effort to continually refine (and keep tactically relevant) the artillery inventory. A subject of some discussion around here of late. Successful Testing of GPS-Guided Artillery Projectile Puts Raytheon-BAE Systems Bofors Excalibur Closer to Fielding (Source: Raytheon Co.; issued Aug. 18; 2006) TUCSON, Ariz. --- The Raytheon Missile Systems and BAE Systems Bofors&apos; Excalibur team successfully test-fired two global positioning system (GPS)-guided 155 mm artillery projectiles that functioned as intended against simulated tactical targets Aug. 10. The program is a cooperative effort between the United States and Sweden. These firings represent completion of the &quot;Guided...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/excalibur.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/excalibur.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:12:02 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from k.v.fortuin on 2006-08-27</title>
            <description>
                I just watched an episode of future weapons on the military channel. I was amazed to see my old battery commander Col. John A. Tanzi. He was a captain back in Korea., I believe hes is now TRADOC. Does anybody know how to reach him?

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/excalibur.html#comment-49729</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/excalibur.html#comment-49729</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:14:06 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2006-08-23</title>
            <description>
                Amanda Garrett, huh? Is that the one where the Captain (Amanda) and the CAG are just about to do the nasty and the PG17C was saved (and the adolescent reader annoyed) by somebody calling GQ just before they get to the good part?


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/excalibur.html#comment-49574</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/excalibur.html#comment-49574</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:58:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Michael Brill on 2006-08-22</title>
            <description>
                The Discovery Channel, Future Weapons, did a show on this event last night.  I assume that it will be broadcast again.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/excalibur.html#comment-49543</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/excalibur.html#comment-49543</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:57:26 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Zendo Deb on 2006-08-22</title>
            <description>
                Life imitates art... these were described in one of the Amanda Garret novels by James H. Cobb - except in a naval application.  The line was something like.... why bother to aim the gun, when you can just tell the round where to go....

Very cool.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/excalibur.html#comment-49541</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/excalibur.html#comment-49541</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:20:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from KCSteve on 2006-08-22</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[In the long ago and far away I worked at the US Army Yuma Proving Ground - my first paying gig involving computers, in fact.  The building I started in was the last one on the 'street' of the Kofa Firing Range.  Approximately 1,000 yards further down the 'street' was the impact area for the 'long range'.  Unless things have changed a <b>lot</b> since 1980 I'd say that those shells impacted right there, about 1,000 yards from where that building was.  A few months into my 6-month contract we moved from there to a <b>much</b> newer building several miles away so that old WWII Quonset hut may be long gone now.

One thing I wonder about the new munitions: That "safety measure that prevents the warhead from detonating when the round impacts outside the intended target area." - wonder what happens if someone picks up such a 'dud' and carries it back over to the intended target area?  Could be... <b>interesting</b>
]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/excalibur.html#comment-49528</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/excalibur.html#comment-49528</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:34:02 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


