<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Annoying officer attitudes, #34,565</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/annoying_officer_attitudes_34565.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/annoying_officer_attitudes_34565_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:49:40 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Annoying officer attitudes, #34,565</title>
            <description>This is a great picture. It&apos;s clever. It&apos;s funny (especially to a combat zone resident). It&apos;s also very counter-productive from an Information Operations perspective. It plays right into the hands of the enemy, like it or not. If I were an officer in that chain of command responsible for that vehicle, I&apos;d feel compelled to do something about it. Probably not enough as far as a resident of Foggy Bottom or a MSM talking head is concerned, but a change that would make a 180-degree difference in the take-away from the pic.* H/t, Strategy Page. *When digitally manipulating pictures (as...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/annoying_officer_attitudes_34565.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/annoying_officer_attitudes_34565.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 07:02:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from PigBoatSailor on 2006-08-15</title>
            <description>
                Hm, ok, good point.  Maybe &quot;Jihadis against the Great Satan&quot;?  Nah, not enough room.  Back to Jihadis I suppose.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/annoying_officer_attitudes_34565.html#comment-49090</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/annoying_officer_attitudes_34565.html#comment-49090</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:47:25 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-08-15</title>
            <description>
                Yeah, old habits die hard.

On the flip side - the target of the jibe *do* see themselves in that light... so perhaps they will look for the flash.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/annoying_officer_attitudes_34565.html#comment-49084</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/annoying_officer_attitudes_34565.html#comment-49084</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:24:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from PigBoatSailor on 2006-08-15</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[How quickly we forget - how about <a href="http://gmapalumni.org/chapomatic/?p=1464" rel="nofollow">"irhabi" or "mufsidoon"</a> photos, to really make sure we aren't counter-productive?
]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/annoying_officer_attitudes_34565.html#comment-49083</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/08/annoying_officer_attitudes_34565.html#comment-49083</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:51:39 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


