previous post next post  

The NYT performs an inadvertent service.

Pointing out an idiot Pentagon official:

According to a Pentagon official, the Americans finally got one. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because details of the raid are classified, [emphsis mine - perhaps there's a *reason* such details are classifed?] said that an Iraqi informant inside Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia provided the critical piece of intelligence about Mr. Rahman's [i.e., Zarqawi's "spiritual adivser"] meeting with Mr. Zarqawi. The source's identity was not clear — nor was it clear how that source was able to pinpoint Mr. Zarqawi's location without getting killed himself. [Unclear to the Times, perhaps, you can bet al-Qaeda will have figured it out by now - as Dr. Johnson observed " "Depend upon it, sir, when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully." They have the incentive]

"We have a guy on the inside who led us directly to Zarqawi," the official said.

Not any more, we don't. Hopefully because we extracted him, vice other, more grisly, options.

Boy, I shoulda been an anonymous blogger. There's so much more I could talk about, going waaaaay back to the beginning of my career! And here all this time, all I hadda be was anonymous!

Hey, the hafway sophisticated among us were able to connect those dots, certainly. Still, when you are trying to recruit insiders, it just strikes me that having semi-official confirmation of details like this, doesn't make more confidence building among the target audience. Even if we *did* bring this guy in from the cold.

Just sayin'.

But I'm not a high-powered defense official. I only play one on this blog.


2 Trackbacks

TrackBack this entry at http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-tb.cgi/5738

Berg: No Good in Al-Zarqawi's Death from Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator on June 9, 2006 9:32 AM

Father of man believed to be beheaded by al-Zarqawi sees no good in terrorist leader's death Read More

Message From Above from The Right Nation on June 9, 2006 11:16 AM

Round-Up: Real Clear Politics, QandO, All Things Beautiful, The Real Ugly American, Radio Blogger, Hugh Hewitt, Blue Crab Boulevard Security Watchtower, PoliPundit.com, Macsmind, Begging to Differ, Leaning Straight Up, Blogging Baghdad, The Jawa Repo... Read More

10 Comments

What an idiot!!
 
Hey, waita min. We don't want to DIScourage this type of behavior, so I hope that the 'source' in DC didn't out the 'source' on the ground. Whatta maroon (the DC source, I have nothing but admiration for the other one, even if he/she did it for the reward money).
 
*shakes head in wonder* Sounds to me like this "anonymous" Pentagon official needs to be an "unemployed" Pentagon official.
 
I still think that the Sunni leadership burned Zarqawi as part of the final negotiations (the statement as leaked may still be *technically* true). The timing is way too coincidental. That makes this revelation an honest-to-goodness psyop on AQ. If I'm right, this was probably done at a low level and the truth will hopefully never be leaked--because the press would throw a hissy fit, and future negotiations would become a heck of a lot harder.
 
I like the suggestion I saw in another forum that the Pentagon should announce that the $25M bounty is being split among the following informants (list of the top four or five AQ in Iraq types). Sure, they'd know that at least some of them were being unfairly 'blamed' but they'd all wonder about at least one of the others...
 
I wouldn't be surprised if we found Zarqy without any stool pigeons at all...saying we did has got to have them doubting each other like crazy.
 
I'm with Blob on this one. Nothing like a little internal strife to make everyone start looking at each other much closer and act more slowly. Even more so if they start thinking "Will he rat me out because he wants MY job?" Granted the life expectancy is short, but think of it this way. Lets say #2 man rats out number 1 man to claim his reward from the Givernment. Knowing how quick they were to take #1 out, and the amount of money they offered for #1, how much more likely will he be to play ball and start decreasing the attacks to keep HIS #2 from wanting that money next.. MICE. Money, Ideaology, Conscience and Ego
 
I'm willing to assume that the informant who got the $25M dollars (and they did announce that someone was getting it) also asked for relocation to some place safe to spend it. I read somewhere that previous informants were relocated if they wished. Of course, I read it in the U.S. press somewhere, so I don't know that it's true.
 
Heh. I think you guys give Pentagon officials waaaaay too much credit.
 
The australian is saying that the insider was actually "two" insiders who were captured during the April raids and knew what safe house Zarqawi was at when he filmed his last video. What they aren't certain of is whether there was an "insider" on the ground giving them the "howdy, Zarq is now here" thumbs up or if it was a UAV hovering above.
 
© 2008 John Donovan
All rights reserved.