previous post next post  

The Grave of the Hundred Head -

Interestingly, Kipling's poem came up in office conversation a couple of weeks ago. We have fascinating conversations at the office, waiting for the data to process...

They made a pile of their trophies
High as a tall man's chin,
Head upon head distorted,
Set in a sightless grin,
Anger and pain and terror
Stamped on the smoke-scorched skin.

Subadar Prag Tewarri
Put the head of the Boh
On the top of the mound of triumph,
The head of his son below-
With the sword and the peacock banner
That the world might behold and know.
Thus the samadh was perfect,
Thus was the lesson plain
Of the wrath of the First Shikaris-
The price of white man slain;
And the men of the First Shikaris
Went back into camp again.

...what may have worked then (there are plenty of counter-examples) will certainly not work now. And, I submit, we don't want it to work for us.

Nor is it a good idea to give vent to your anger over the deaths of Private First Class Kristian Menchaca and Private First Class Thomas L. Tucker screaming for the heads of the jihadis to be piled high in the streets - and doing so for the Joy of Google. I imagine the jihadis are having a good chuckle. (Hi, a$$hats! What's that whistling noise?)

It's a war. War sucks. Being blown into large chunks, but still concious and bleeding out isn't a much better fate. Burning to death in a vehicle isn't a better fate than befell our two soldiers.

And the calls, as I've seen them elsewhere, for "3 heads for every one!" isn't useful and only plays into our enemy's hands, however much it sounds like a satisfying revenge to our lizard brains.

The costs, to our soldiers and our nation, far outweigh any unlikely benefit. We're already fighting people who want to die fighting us. The manner of their death, fantasies of wrapping them in pigskin notwithstanding, simply isn't the deterrent some think (or wish) it will be. Blowing Indians from the guns certainly makes for pride-swelling reading if you're a Brit, doesn't it? Proud to tell your grandkids that story? Results matter. But how we achieve the results sets the stage for later. As the Germans found out when they went into Russia, and paid the price on the way out.

The Germans tried reprisals. What did it gain them? Allied Armies in Berlin, and the East in ruins. Same-same Japan. It didn't work out well for the French, either. And in those areas where it has worked, sorta, it has been between opponents who are very much not like us.

Don Sensing has covered this terrain before.

I personally don't think we can get that much tougher, without throwing restraint aside and becoming a terrible mirror of our foe. We're already killing them at a rate greater than three to one, and they revel in the dying, do the jihadis.

I don't mind killing them, truth to tell. But to repay savagery with savagery will put a burden on our soldiers and ourselves that will not be repaid with success on the battlefield. If we were to react as some wish - it would, I believe, kill the mission in Iraq, and guarantee the Global Opinion Golem would stomp it flat. And that when it was all said and done - just as many many people can recognize My Lai and almost no one but those who were there and geeks like me can relate NVA/VC atrocities in Hue - everybody would remember an American equivalent of "The Grave of the Hundred Dead" and no one, other than those who were there and geeks like me would remember Private First Class Kristian Menchaca and Private First Class Thomas L. Tucker.

It is *not* the American Way of War - which is precisely why it is memorable when we do it, and "Yeah, so?" when they do it.

It isn't always easy, it isn't always fair, as the song goes.

It's a hell of a leadership challenge that now faces our most junior leaders. Keeping their figurative heads, so that those about them don't lose their metaphysical heads.

And if what happened to those two soldiers harden's the public resolve to continue the fight - *that* would actually be good!

For those who keep hearing about it but haven't read the poem - it's in the Flash Traffic/Extended Entry.

The Grave of the Hundred Head

by Rudyard Kipling.

There's a widow in sleepy Chester
Who weeps for her only son;
There's a grave on the Pabeng River,
A grave that the Burmans shun;
And there's Subadar Prag Tewarri
Who tells how the work was done.

A Snider squibbed in the jungle-
Somebody laughed and fled,
And the men of the First Shikaris
Picked up their Subaltern dead,
With a big blue mark in his forehead
And the back blown out of his head.

Subadar Prag Tewarri,
Jemadar Hira Lal,
Took command of the party,
Twenty rifles in all,
Marched them down to the river
As the day was beginning to fall.

They buried the boy by the river,
A blanket over his face-
They wept for their dead Lieutenant,
The men of an alien race-
They made a samadh1 in his honour,
A mark for his resting-place.

For they swore by the Holy Water,
They swore by the salt they ate,
That the soul of Lieutenant Eshmitt Sahib
Should go to his God in state,
With fifty file of Burmans
To open him Heaven's Gate.

The men of the First Shikaris
Marched till the break of day,
Till they came to the rebel village
The village of Pabengmay-
A jingal2 covered the clearing,
Caltrops hampered the way.

Subadar Prag Tewarri,
Bidding them load with ball,
Halted a dozen rifles
Under the village wall;
Sent out a flanking-party
With Jemadar Hira Lal.
The men of the First Shikaris
Shouted and smote and slew,
Turning the grinning jingal
On to the howling crew.
The Jemadar's flanking-party
Butchered the folk who flew.

Long was the morn of slaughter,
Long was the list of slain,
Five score heads were taken,
Five score heads and twain;
And the men of the First Shikaris
Went back to their grave again,

Each man bearing a basket
Red as his palms that day,
Red as the blazing village-
The village of Pabengmay
And the "drip-drip-drip" from the baskets
Reddened the grass by the way

They made a pile of their trophies
High as a tall man's chin,
Head upon head distorted,
Set in a sightless grin,
Anger and pain and terror
Stamped on the smoke-scorched skin.

Subadar Prag Tewarri
Put the head of the Boh
On the top of the mound of triumph,
The head of his son below-
With the sword and the peacock banner
That the world might behold and know.
Thus the samadh was perfect,
Thus was the lesson plain
Of the wrath of the First Shikaris-
The price of white man slain;
And the men of the First Shikaris
Went back into camp again.

Then a silence came to the river,
A hush fell over the shore,
And Bohs that were brave departed,
And Sniders squibbed no more;
For the Burmans said
That a white man's head
Must be paid for with heads five-score.

There's a widow in sleepy Chester
Who weeps for her only son;
There's a grave on the Pabeng River,
A grave that the Burmans shun;
And there's Subadar Prag Tewarri
Who tells how the work was done.

1A memorial. 2 Native cannon.

6 Comments

Good point. War isn't about retribution. War is about transforming something from a into b(in this case a region of the world where unrestrained struggle has some cache to one where it has nearly none). Retribution is about erradicating a. Not the same thing. That's kinda why GWOT is such a BAD phrase. It makes it sound like we're only after a few jokers when what we're really about is draining the whole frickin' swamp and shifting the paradigm by which they see the world(as Jonah might say, to get them to stop holding paper). It won't irradicate terrorism or terrorists, but it'll turn it to drips and drabs of professional malcontents instead of a formless army like it is now.
 
Yep. Slapping back is tempting but it's much more effective to hit 'em where it hurts the most. In this case it's by the kids in Iraq contrasting the actions of the people who target them with car bombs with the actions of the people who risk their lives getting out of their armored vehicles to give them candy. And it's in the people on whose fingers where the ink stains may have faded but in whom the memories never will. Most, if not quite all, of the people we're fighting today will never change their minds. At best we can make it so they're forced to change their ways. Ah, but the other people in the region - they're the ones who face the choice every day of which way to turn. In a place that's long been so dim the rage of the dark's siren call has all but drowned out anything else -- until now, with the coming of the light. Saddam's trial is seen as a sham by many but it's one of the most important things happening. It shows that everyone is subject to the rule of Law, no matter how high and mighty they may be, or have been, and no matter how deep the hatred for them may run.
 
Agreed... Despite the initial surge of rage and desire for vengeance, reprisals would do nothing but steel the enemy's resolve... We pride oursleves on being professional; now is the acid test, and I am confident that we will pass it... What should happen now is a massive media campeign to showcase the evil deed done to our war-fighters, splashed across the face of the world, written in plain language... If fact, hindsight being 20/20, I wonder why we, with all of our technological capabilities, didn't have a plan to inform every single Iraqi as to our intentions as soon as the initial assault happened, keeping them in the loop and letting them know what we were about: "We're gonna take out the bad guys, get the place cleaned up, and give it back in better shape than it was..." We may have, I don't know... But now, we must support our war-fighters more than ever, and re-enforce our belief, as well as our expectation, that they will continue to perform as the discplined professionals that we know they are...
 
i think you just went a long way around it all just to set us up for a "Caltrop whazzis" tomorrow.
 
I agree. Who did not know that the enemy would do this type of thing? Who did not know that they already had many times over to people, mostly civilians? Margaret Hassan, Nick Berg, Bigley, hundreds of hapless Iraqis in Fallujah? We did see the torture rooms and the videos. It is nothing new or worse because it is our men who suffered it. It is simply a reminder of who and what the enemy is. I mean, does anyone believe they have honor? You can't even equate this stuff to any memorable Muslim warrior of medieval times. In the words of an infamous senator: in the manner of Genghis Khan. Or maybe even better would be a ted bundy or John Wayne Gacie or Jeffrey Dahmer. You've seen it all before. Rage only blinds you. Anger you suck up and use to take the next step and do the next thing when it all seemed too hard before. Revenge is best served cold and our revenge is nothing different than originally planned. The thing that scares the Jihadist the most happens every day with kids running around with adidas t-shirts, nike shoes, listening to 50 cent, playing in fields with American soccer balls. Every time a microwave is bought, a television is turned on, the radio is listened to, TS Eliot or Byron or Locke or Paine is read, every pair of jeans, every timex watch...and on and on and on.... Everytime, we win the battle and every time is that much closer to winning the war. In fact, the day I saw the video with Zarqawi wearing new balance shoes with his terrorist outfit, I knew the long war was won. I didn't laugh about his make shift jihad uniform or what a clown he was with his malfunctioning gun and white shoes under his all black ninja uniform. I laughed because even the great Zarqawi, defender of Islam and would be destroyer of the West was not immune to western products, ideas or proclivities. He knew quality when he saw it and that quality came from us. Like I said, it happens every day. every time a soldier waves, a child gets a toy or book bag or pencils or notepads or hotwheels cars and a mother smiles, we win the battle. Everytime another teenager wants to dance like Brittney in the deserts of Babil, we win. Don't cry for these men. Remember them and remember what they were there for. Remember that the enemy can do no more or less than they already have or they would have done it already. A sign of weakness when the best you can do is kidnap severely injured people and torture and kill them AND only because the squad made a mistake and broke formation. Otherwise, the enemy has very few chances to do any such thing. While we on the other hand kill them at a rate of three to one, own the air and own the most battle space. You can't call that losing by any means.
 
"I mean, does anyone believe they have honor? You can't even equate this stuff to any memorable Muslim warrior of medieval times." Actually, Kat, I think you can. If I remember right, and I'm not saying I do, there's a story about an old man who fought against Crusaders, loping off heads left and right, that I've been told by someone who spent a healthy amount of time in the ME selling Hawk missiles that's now being interpreted to mean that anything in defense of Islam and Islamic territory is honorable and glorious. Differing cultural myths matter. See, I don't think people want to be 'free', which puts me at odds with lots of people(right up to the President). It's not a basic desire. Most people want to be RFHaLA(Rich, Fat, Happy, and Left Alone). We need to show the people over there that either a) Establishing a liberal state over there will give them RFHaLA conditions or b) we're going to get rid of the insane fighters over there to let the gen pop get on with becoming RFHaLA. Right now the insurgents seem to have the ability to disrupt RFHaLA and have planted the seed that they will lead the people to some sort of RFHaLA once we have been forced to leave. Because of that planted seed they're able to do what Mao said all revolutionaries must do(swim freely amounst the gen populace). Either thru intimidation or because people believe the insurgentcy will let them have an RFHaLA existance in tune with their cultural myths. I'm hoping intimidation. As the mob knows, intimidation always creates a stoolie.