<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for D.A.M.N.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:52:18 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>D.A.M.N.</title>
            <description>If you don&apos;t understand the title - visit Greyhawk&apos;s post. What with the flurry on the &apos;net with OIF Alphabet V1.0 and OIF Alphabet V2.0, and Bubblehead&apos;s posting of one of the more complete versions of the Staffer&apos;s Hard Sayings Log, it&apos;s time to bring up the Commander&apos;s Guidance bit. Just minutes away from the Change of Command ceremony, the outgoing and incoming commander are in the commander&apos;s office chatting about the unit, the personalities of key leaders (formal and informal), strengths and weaknesses, and wouldn&apos;t she back off a bit on that Change of Command inventory? The outgoing commander...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 05:47:53 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-06-10</title>
            <description>
                OL - I did say I was dating myself...  and the AF did calve from the Army.

Certainly, &quot;Top&quot; is the most common term in Army usage.

But really - the story works for any service, just insert your own appropriate terms.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46294</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46294</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:22:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Oldloadr on 2006-06-10</title>
            <description>
                John of Argghhh! - OK, I&apos;ll take your word for it on the first shirt term.  I admit that I did not research, but went on incuctive resoning.  I did a lot of joint service deployments on active duty, lived on an Army post (Landstuhl) while assigned to Ramstein AB, and have worked these past 2.5 years for the Army as a contractor and I swear the only jargon I ever heard used by grunts refering the the exalted position of 1st Sgt was &quot;Top.&quot;

Anyway, i think your parable applies equally to both services and I&apos;m sure there are a lot of Tops and First Shirts out there who could have used their own 3 envelopes at one time or another.  
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46293</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46293</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:38:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-06-10</title>
            <description>
                *We* don&apos;t have rubber chicken at my club.

But we do torture guest speakers sometimes.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46292</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46292</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 06:02:45 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-06-10</title>
            <description>
                SFC D - no, the term &quot;First Shirt&quot; in the AF *derives* from the Army usage.

I&apos;m just dating myself, and revealing that I&apos;ve had a DoD-issued ID card since birth.  

It&apos;s all about US Army company command.

No amalgamation there.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46291</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46291</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 06:01:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2006-06-10</title>
            <description>
                Umm, I&apos;ve actually heard the &quot;prepare three envelopes&quot; joke before, from an about-to-retire General Motors president, at a Rotary Club meeting here to which my late Dad dragged me.

  I had no idea that GM had so many vice-presidents.

  One was sitting next to me. He was very fulsome cheerful and voluble in his conversation with me until I mentioned that I had suffered from owning a G*dd*mned D*gfisking CHEVROLET VEGA!  

He didn&apos;t bother me much after that, and I got to eat my rubber chicken in peace.

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46290</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46290</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:27:44 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from oldloadr on 2006-06-10</title>
            <description>
                Speaking of jargon: this is an amalgamated parable.  

1.  The commander is a Captain (0-3)
2.  The 1st Sgt. is refered to as &quot;First Shirt&quot;

Now, normal Army slang for the first sgt. is &quot;Top&quot; whereas the AF uses the term &quot;First Shirt.&quot;  However, except for AETC, Captains are never commanders of AF squadrons (usually Majors or Lt. Colonels) whereas Army company commanders are almost always Captains.



            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46288</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46288</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 00:40:07 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-06-09</title>
            <description>
                Awwww, I bet you say that to *all* the guys.

I&apos;m guessing SWWBO might have a few tweaks she&apos;d still like to see implemented in Armorer V3.x
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46284</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46284</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:51:50 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cassandra on 2006-06-09</title>
            <description>
                You are *so* bad.

Don&apos;t ever change.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46283</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46283</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:32:23 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from brogonzo on 2006-06-09</title>
            <description>
                Funny because it&apos;s clever, and sad because it&apos;s probably true.

Suggest adding to the list of &quot;Signs you&apos;ve been around headquarters units too long&quot; this item:

You understand more than half of the jargon in this joke.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46255</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/06/damn.html#comment-46255</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 07:03:51 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


