previous post next post  

A case of the vapors...

Important battle rule for commanders: Always remember that the first intel reports are usually wrong.

That's what leapt to mind when I saw this Instapundit post.

Granted, I'm with a lot of conservatives on the frustration I feel with The Gang That Can't Shoot Straight, aka the GOP, but when you're up to your a$$ in political alligators, the correct strategy isn't to stick your head into one of the reptiles' mouths. Especially when the net result of staying home on election day or voting for Democrats will give us:

- An even more radical and totalitarian court system,
- Crushing tax burdens on business and individuals,
- A disastrous and capitualtory approach to foreign policy, e.g., what problems there are in the world are America's fault and we should take out lead from our UN and European betters, starting with a wholesale retreat from Iraq, letting Iran get the bomb (by relying on "negotiations" and the "watchdog" UN IAEA...run by a Muslim, no less), etc.
- Then there's immigration--the Dems want felons to be able to vote (at least some have raised the issue in public), why not illegals? Suffice it to say, for all their protestations about Bush's cavalier attitude on Mexicans, et al., in their heart of hearts, they see the 12 million+ new "constituents" as a good thing, so I doubt there'll be much of a change in policy...and what little there will be will probably not be in our national interest.

Shall I go on? Bottom line: Are we really ready to trust the Dems with the responsibility of keeping this country safe, it's aconomy strong and its people free?

In any case, I went on to read the comments associated with the above post. Fortunately, the vast majority are saying, and I'm paraphrasing, "OK, things are rough right now, but cutting the nose off to spite the face ain't exactly a prudent response."

Again, Glenn's "intel" has a little more to it than the impression left on Instapundit.

Personally, I like the Churchillian approach: Never, never, never give up.

9 Comments

While you are in the main correct, I *still* think we should knock off a few of the Republican idjits in the primaries in relatively safe seats. That would send a message to the party without compromising the congressional voting math. Sigh. Just once, I'd like to vote *for* someone instead of against someone. Hasn't been that way since Reagan.
 
I'm afraid to even get into this one. I've weighed in enough times, Lord knows. If I were all these smart-alecky twits who want to "teach the party a lesson", I might pay a little more attention to the doings in the Illinois and Ca. legislatures. Taint in the news much now, but a few seats here and there could have an effect I'm not sure any of us really want. And now I'll shut up before I lose my temper.
 
I haven't voted "for" a President in decades- merely voted "against" the other guy. *sigh* That being said, I also don't align myself with any particular party (except in Primaries, where you have to declare a party and vote down party lines). I vote for the best candidate (or the lesser of two evils in some cases). My vote lies with the candidate who most closely resembles my line of thinking, and I don't give a rat's ass which party they belong to. We're Americans. Republican, Democrat, Independent, Green- whatever. We're all Americans. I just want the best for my country.
 
John, I disagree with your "minor slap" theory. Even with the majority they have now, congressional GOPers can't get enough of the agenda through to count (SCOTUS appointments notwithstanding). Shaving a few more votes off the count isn't wise, IMHO. Granted, the conservative bent is much less apparent than it was in '94--witness Trent Lott's recent haughty dismissal of the Porkbuster movement--but the Opposition is SO much more crazy than at any time in our history that, even if we're hanging on by our fingernails, it's better than indulging in a fit of pique, that results in a miscalculation, that gives us a Dem majority. It just ain't worth the risk, at least for now. But I feel your pain. (Sorry. Couldn't resist.)
 
Dusty - I am with you, right down the line. "No" - I do Not trust the Dems with our economy or our security. Period. John - We must start fighting that battle at the local level, before we can win it at the upper (national) level. I realize that as a strategy, this has a huge lead-time, but simply replacing a GOP "Can't Shoot Straight" type with a Dem who we don't trust is NOT the answer. Get term limits in place, vote the dummies (in both parties) out, and get fresh blood in, but we should not simply throw up our hands and hope that the other side will be able to accomplish what needs to be done.
 
I kinda like that Sen Dean guy, he's got a real honest face. I think he deserves a chance, And that John Kerry guy, too. Cheers
 
Just in case you missed it - I said kill the idjits in the primaries, replacing them with new blood *from* the right. Not in the general election.
 
John, I sit corrected - and agree.
 
Gee, John, the reaction to your post musta been rather a disappointment, eh? 8^ D
 
© 2008 John Donovan
All rights reserved.