<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for What&apos;s odd about this blimp?</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:54:47 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>What&apos;s odd about this blimp?</title>
            <description> Make your guess. Then click here. Did that change your mind any? No? Okay. Click here. Betcha thought it was more like this, dincha?...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:12:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Blake Kirk on 2006-03-24</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The US Navy operated at least one sub with an "x" configuration tail.  USS Albacore (AGSS-569), a conventionally-powered experimental submarine which operated from 1953 to 1971 was fitted with an "X" empennage as part of her fourth major refit.  The highly streamlined Albacore pioneered the hull form and many of the major operating systems, including the towed sonar array, now used on US Navy subs.  After being retired from fleet service, Albacore was donated to a memorial association and installed in a dry berth in Portsmouth, NH, where she now serves as a museum. 

<a href="http://www.portsmouthnh.com/harbourtrail/albacore.cfm" rel="nofollow">See a photo here</a>.
]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-43005</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-43005</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:05:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from homebru on 2006-03-23</title>
            <description>
                
Well, there&apos;s my &quot;learn something new&quot; for the day.

Still looks like it would unnecessarily complicate the control rigging.  But I can see that it would help minimize damage to the lower rudder during ground handling.

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42979</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42979</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:32:17 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Neffi on 2006-03-23</title>
            <description>
                Well, no Chief- they didn&apos;t perzackly *let* me. But where there&apos;s a will, etc. Such fortitude and persistence has gotten me where I am today.
Gotta go! They&apos;re ringing the chow bell and if yer late you get no fruit cup!!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42977</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42977</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:27:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-03-23</title>
            <description>
                Heh. &apos;Fess up, Neffi--your folks let you play with matches when you were a kid, didn&apos;t they...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42970</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42970</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:51:54 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Neffi on 2006-03-23</title>
            <description>
                I was gonna say the thing wrong with the blimp was that it wasn&apos;t out looking for old artillery to paw over... but on second thought, I won&apos;t.
snerk
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42965</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42965</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:06:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-03-23</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Here's one for the bubbleheads. The Dutch <a href="http://www.dutchsubmarines.com/classes/images/class_walrus2_2.jpg" rel="nofollow"><b>Walrus(2) class</b></a> attack sub has an other-than-cruciform butt, too...]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42944</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42944</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:40:58 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-03-23</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[homebru - The empennage orientation means it's modelled after a post-1975 style blimp versus the classic WWII design. Here's an <a href="http://www.goodyearblimp.com/archive/c_3blimps.html" rel="nofollow"><b>interesting shot</b></a> demonstrating the difference...]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42940</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42940</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:28:25 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from homebru on 2006-03-23</title>
            <description>
                First was the lack of national markings.  Then the dinky landing gear. Then the unusual orientation of the tail feathers (not hor/vert).  And then, of course, the mylar skin.

The short cabin height with no windows was another point.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42932</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42932</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:39:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-03-23</title>
            <description>
                The mylar skin was a dead giveaway and the dinky little landing gear confirmed it.


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42921</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/whats_odd_about_this_blimp.html#comment-42921</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:42:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


