previous post next post  

The Freed Hostages.

Some more info from a mailing list I'm on:

This is a clip from a much longer report that can be accessed only as a premium subscriber at stratfor; however, I thought this merited bringing to your attention:

Hostage Rescue in Iraq: A Western Intelligence Network in Action The March 23 rescue of three Western peace activists held hostage in Iraq for four months was the work of an elite multinational unit known as Task Force Black. The rescue operation -- which involved undercover work, informant payoffs, surveillance and the arrest and interrogation of suspects -- suggests that efforts to establish an intelligence-gathering network in Iraq are beginning to pay off.

Task Force Black rescued Canadians Harmeet Singh Sooden and James Loney, along with Briton Norman Kember, all members of the group Christian Peacemaker Teams who were kidnapped while on their way to a meeting with the Association of Muslim Scholars in Baghdad in November 2005. The fourth hostage, American Tom Fox, had been shot dead, and his body dumped March 9 on a Baghdad street.

Led by British Special Air Service (SAS) members, Task Force Black is a team of some 250 personnel, including U.S., Australian and British special forces as well as intelligence personnel from various agencies. Following the November kidnappings, FBI agents, MI6 officers, Canadian kidnap experts and hostage negotiators from Scotland Yard also were brought in to work on the case.

Of course, the list has it's Contrarian Corps as well...

STRATFOR's conclusions are premature. The success of a single operation, however impressive, does not justify the drawing of general conclusions about the success OR failure of intelligence gathering efforts in Iraq.

To which the original poster replied:

So, is this just market driven analysis (be first) or is it somehow propaganda?

Followed up by:

Well, we're given one data point (& how reliable is the source?). As I remember from my math classes in the last century, one can draw an infinite number of lines through one point.

Re. propaganda, usually the best stuff is just a wee bit off the truth...

I have insufficient data for a meaningful answer.

2 Comments

Some serious questions about Harmeet Singh Sooden. He is residing in New Zeland on a student visa (NZ newspapers had headline "Kiwi Hostage Rescued!) He has spent considerable time in the West Bank postesting against Israel. His organisation failed to thank anyone for their rescue with their initially claiming the terrorists had "released" them. Given that New Zeland immigration is trying to deport a white African family because the father changed jobs and didn't tell them soon enough why is Harmeet Singh Sooden's family now in New Zealand and Harmeet Singh Sooden himself still welcome here when he clearly failed to adhere to the conditions of his student visa and undertake study? Or is being an anti-western terrorist supporter considered "study" by the Clark administration? If Bush is after the countries that are giving aid and shelter to terrorists I can recomend which beaches are best for landing and I for welcome our new American overlords.
 
Here's another part, I understand that when we arrived for the rescue, the kidnappers were gone, either having been alerted by the arrest of their co-conspirator or having a local look out network that alerted them. Either way, they skiddadled and it must have been on really short notice since they did not kill the hostages. In either case, it was completed through the hard work of the intelligence program. And, in regards to the "single point" reference and whether this is propaganda or not... First, this is not the first case of this type. The Australian Douglas Wood was "released/rescued" in a similar manner and so were a number of other hostages whose names escape me. This is not about an intelligence program that has "finally" gotten off the ground. It is about one that has already been working. Obviously, a problem that has plagued this war and every effort within it since the moment the planes struck the towers, continues to plague even the overt successes with mealy mouthed nitwits insisting that any announcement of success is "propaganda". What is that problem? The bizarre expectation of 100% success rate and the concept that absence of such omnipotent capability indicates complete and utter failure of whatever individual endeavor or over all war effort. It's bizarre in it's idea that the US or it's allies, being a super power, should be able to accomplish every effort with minimal force, expense and loss of blood. This is the problem that plagues Iraqis themselves and why they have fell into this quasi civil war with individual players coming and going between legitimate government and power mongering "insurgents". They had overweening expectations. Or, as previously discussed, the "the man on the moon" idealism: ie, we can put a man on the moon but not turn on electricity in one simple baghdad neighborhood. Of course, what is forgotten is that men being put on the moon is because many people had the same goal, worked 24/7, encountered obstacles but worked together to overcome them, knew what they were responsible for and did it with much self sacrifice and little whining. Of course, no one was threatening to blow up the rocket if their idea did not get used in building the rocket. Smarmy comments about "one point of reference" are about as useful as the "peace activists" thanking their killers for not killing them. On another point, there is certainly not enough credit being given for the search and rescue efforts. Imagine that, in the US, hundreds of thousands of people going missing every year including children AND adults. The success rate within a free and relatively secure nation by police and FBI using similar techniques is extremely low as well. The problem is in expectations and comparisons. What were these fellows comparing this to, to be so self satisfied in declaring the announcement "propaganda" and insufficient evidence of success? Who are they and what do they know? This is why our guys and girls over there are continuously disappointed in the coverage by the media and the commentary by such uneducated commenters about the progress or purpose of these efforts.
 
© 2008 John Donovan
All rights reserved.