Persons of Size in the Army.

From an Army Captain who recently handed over command:


How's this for messed up? Army fatties, rejoice!

This is, IMO, completely retarded. I can only guess that they're having too many course failures and/or turnbacks for failing to meet ht/wt and/or APFT standards, possibly connected to the difficulty of doing PT (especially running) during extended deployments. And I'm sure a lot of soldiers and NCOs come back from deployment overdue for some school or other, and get shipped to the next available class, without much of a chance to get back in shape. Of course, my solution to this would be to delay sending them until they meet the standards.

On a separate but related note, I don't think the Army should get quite so bent out of shape about ht/wt/body fat. I think if you can pass the PT test, it shouldn't matter. However, I would make those soldiers who don't meet ht/wt/body fat pass at a higher level-say, increase the minimum to pass by 5 pts per event for every 1% or fraction thereof over the standard.

Because those big corn fed boys are useful for humping heavy stuff, like mortars, MGs, 155 rounds, HMMWV tires...

CPT "Z" (Changed to protect the guilty)

Heh. An issue near and dear to the Armorer's heart, having fought AR 600-9 and it's pernicious effects for virtually his entire career. While I don't completely disagree with the good Captain - I do disagree on making hefty people meet a higher standard. Either they're acceptably fit, or they aren't. Regardless of being an endomorph, ectomorph, or mesomorph. AR 600-9 is more about looks than fitness. And looks trump over fitness, too (in my Army, not that I supported that).

Why do we simply not raise the fitness bar so that if you aren't fit it won't matter? Simple. Too many thin, pretty people would fail the new standard. Far more than fat guys would pass. And then, horror of horror, there would *still* be fat guys enraging the Sergeant's Major and Pencil-Necked, Sunken-Chested Marathon-Running-Geek enablers in the Officer Corps.

Truth - the sin is Not Looking Good In The Bus Driver Suit. I don't care if you can score 290 on your PT test (out of 300, with a minimum to pass of 210). I'm gonna toss yer fat ass and keep that good looking pansy who scores 240, because your profile view just pisses me off. Think that isn't an issue with some people? Read on -

From a serving Sergeant Major:

Here is my two cents once again.....thank god I am retiring. I can just see it getting to the point where guys like Southerland [sic] (my cartman from south park soldier) representing at an NCOES school.......good god how low will we go. SGM X
Now SGM X's "Cartman" troop may be a non-PT marshmallow who can't lead his way out of a paper bag and doesn't know his job. But that doesn't appear to be the SGM's concern (and I'm putting words in his mouth, to be sure).

From a serving CSM:


Now all Soldiers don't have to feel guilty about telling MacDonald's or Burger King to Super Size their order, because they still get to graduate whether they fail the APFT, HT/WT, or both. As a previous Commandant of [an] NCO Academy, I have my own personal opinion about this new change in graduation requirements & I've already given it to the FORSCOM CSM.

I knew this was coming down the chimney, but this is it in black & white & is now the LAW of the Land. Make sure your Leaders/Soldiers are aware of the new changes, but this is not a free card to BLOW UP!

CSM X.

I'm sympathetic to the PT issue with CSM X. And I don't mind a little emphasis on weight, either. And I think I know why we've implemented the policy - as CPT Z observed, keeping it up while deployed can be hard. And with people shifting around so much, delaying their schooling might find them in a unit which gets lock-down for a new deployment and they never get to school - hence, send 'em whether they can pass or not.

But, are we doing these guys a favor? Nope. We're still going to kill their careers, at least kill 'em if the war slows down to a more peacetime optempo. How? Because no matter how well they do in the course, how well they perform, how well they test - their academic efficiency report in their personnel file is going to read "Marginally Achieved Course Standards". Which, when things slow down, will be cause to pass them over for promotion. Got that? A guy who scored 70% in academics, isn't too chubby, and got a 210 on the PT test is going to have a better report than the guy who's a little chunky, got a 240 on the PT test and 95% in academics. We gotta have standards - I'm with it. But the first guy is going to get promoted with a lot less effort than the second guy, who is the better all around troop.

Which means, soldiers - you've got to do what you've got to do to get and stay on the right side of the standards. But it also means, perhaps more importantly, that the LEADERS have to lead. And make sure that they maximize their troop's chances to excel, to include, if possible, delaying them from attending schools and giving them the opportunity to get right with the regs if the situation allows.

Because the stupid part of this whole thing is - we tell ourselves our standards are all about combat readiness and being fit to fight. But - when we have to fight, we ditch the standards to keep the bodies. Then, after we've sent them to combat and the war ends, we cripple them for a peacetime career by applying peacetime standards to wartime performances... peacetime standards that we just, in effect, said weren't really that important anyway.

Which means what? They aren't important in peacetime either, truth to tell. They just give us easy ways to cull the herd without having to do the hard job of writing proper evaluations - we just inflate 'em and let this objective standard be a weed whacker, because remember - a good looking fit gets by soldier is better than a high-performing fatso who can pass a PT test.

Just sayin'.

I invite your comments...

Ya wanna read the actual message - it's in the Flash Traffic/Extended Entry.

FYI,
As you can see major changes regarding Physical Fitness and Height and Weight Requirements for Military Institutional Training.


FROM: DA WASHINGTON DC//DAMO-TR//DAMO-TRL//DAMO-TRI//

TO: AL ALARACT


SUBJECT: PHYSICAL FITNESS AND HEIGHT AND WEIGHT REQUIREMENTS FOR MILITARY INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING


1. REFERENCES:


A. ARMY REGULATION 350-1, DATED, 13 JANUARY 2006, ARMY TRAINING AND LEADER DEVELOPMENT.

B. ARMY REGULATION 600-9, DATED, 10 JUNE 1987, THE ARMY WEIGHT CONTROL PROGRAM AND INTERIM CHANGE (101), DATED, 4 MARCH 1994.

C. ARMY REGULATION 600-8-2, DATED, 23 DECEMBER 2004, SUSPENSION OF FAVORABLE PERSONNEL ACTIONS (FLAGS).

D. MESSAGE, DTG 220334Z JUL 05, SUBJECT: ALARACT 145/2005, APFT STANDARDS FOR SOLDIERS ENROLLING IN WARRANT OFFICER CANDIDATE SCHOOL (WOCS) OR OFFICERS CANDIDATE SCHOOL (OCS).

2. SOLDIERS ATTENDING INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING COURSES SHOULD MEET THE HEIGHT AND WEIGHT STANDARDS IAW AR 600-9 AND THE PHYSICAL FITNESS STANDARDS OF AR 350-1.

3. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, THE ARMY'S POLICY CONCERNING THE ARMY PHYSICAL FITNESS TEST (APFT) AND HEIGHT AND WEIGHT STANDARDS (AR 600-9) APPLICABLE TO INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING IS AMENDED TO REFLECT THE FOLLOWING CHANGES (REFERENCE 1 A, PARAGRAPH 3-9):

A. AS AN END OF COURSE GRADUATION REQUIREMENT, SOLDIERS ATTENDING INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING COURSES, IN EITHER A PCS OR TDY STATUS, WILL BE ADMINISTERED THE APFT AND SCREENED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH AR 600-9 STANDARDS.

(1) SOLDIERS WHO MEET ACADEMIC COURSE REQUIREMENTS, BUT FAIL APFT STANDARDS WILL BE CONSIDERED A COURSE GRADUATE AND RECEIVE A DA FORM 1059 WITH ITEM 13. C. BLOCK MARKED, "MARGINALLY ACHIEVED COURSE STANDARDS, " AND ITEM 16 CONTAINING THE STATEMENT, "13. C.: SOLDIER MET ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS, BUT FAILED TO MEET APFT STANDARDS IAW AR 350-1."

(2) SOLDIERS WHO MEET ACADEMIC COURSE REQUIREMENTS, BUT FAIL BODY FAT COMPOSITION STANDARDS WILL BE CONSIDERED A COURSE GRADUATE AND RECEIVE A DA FORM 1059 WITH ITEM 13. C. BLOCK MARKED, "MARGINALLY ACHIEVED COURSE STANDARDS, " AND ITEM 16 CONTAINING THE STATEMENT, "13. C.: SOLDIER MET ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS, BUT FAILED TO MEET BODY COMPOSITION STANDARDS IAW AR 600-9."

(3) SOLDIERS WHO MEET ACADEMIC COURSE REQUIREMENTS, BUT FAIL TO MEET ARMY STADNARDS FOR BOTH THE APFT AND WEIGHT CONTROL WILL BE CONSIDERED A COURSE GRADUATE AND RECEIVE A DA FORM 1059 WITH ITEM 13C BLOCK MARKED "MARGINALLY ACHIEVED COURSE STANDARDS", AND ITEM 16 CONTAINING THE STATEMENT "13C: SOLDIER MET ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS, BUT FAILED TO MEET APFT STANDARDS IAW AR 350-1 AND FAILED TO MEET THE BODY FAT COMPOSITION STANDARDS IAW AR 600-9."

B. BECAUSE OF THIS CHANGE, INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING COURSES WILL ADMINISTER THE ARMY PHYSICAL FITNESS TEST AND HEIGHT/WEIGHT SCREENING FOR FINAL COURSE REQUIREMENT, ALLOWING FOR ONE RETEST AND/OR SCREENING NO EARLIER THAN SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE APFT FAILURE AND/OR FAILING TO MEET HEIGHT AND WEIGHT STANDARDS.

C. THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH WITHIN AR 350-1, PARAGRAPH 3-9, TITLED, "PHYSICAL FITNESS AND HEIGHT AND WEIGHT REQUIREMENTS FOR MILITARY INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING," SUB PARAGRAPHS, G, H AND I ARE NO LONGER APPLICABLE.

D. SOLDIERS FLAGGED FOR WEIGHT CONTROL WILL NO LONGER BE BLOCKED FROM SCHEDULING, SELECTION, OR ATTENDANCE TO MILITARY SCHOOLING. IN CONCERT WITH THIS ANNOUNCMENT, THE ARMY G-1 WILL AMEND AR 600-8-2 TO REFLECT THIS CHANGE.

4. SOLDIERS ENROLLING IN WOCS OR OCS MUST TAKE AND PASS THE STANDARD THREE-EVENT APFT. THE ALTERNATE APFT IS AUTHORIZED WITH AN APPROVED WAIVER FROM HQDA, DCS, G3/5/7 (REFERENCE 1 D). IF A SOLDIER ENROLLED IN WOCS OR OCS FAILS THE INITIAL APFT, THE SOLDIER WILL BE ALLOWED ONE RETEST WITH A SUBSEQUENT CLASS. SOLDIERS FAILING THE SECOND APFT WILL BE CONSIDERED INELIGIBLE AND MUST REAPPLY FOR OCS OR WOCS SELECTION.

5. PARAGRAPH 3-9 C OF AR 350-1, REMAINS IN EFFECT. THE CG, TRADOC, WILL RECOMMEND PHYSICAL FITNESS STANDARDS FOR ENTRY INTO RECRUITER, DRILL SERGEANT, AIRBORNE AND RANGER COURSES, SPECIAL FORCES ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION, AND OTHER SCHOOLS REQUIRING SEPARATE PHYSICAL FITNESS STANDARDS TO HQDA, DCS, G-3/5/7, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. SOLDIERS WHO FAIL TO MEET THESE STANDARDS WILL BE DENIED ENROLLMENT AND RETURNED TO THEIR UNIT OF ASSIGNMENT.

6. ALTHOUGH SOLDIERS ATTENDING INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING SHOULD MEET THE HEIGHT AND WEIGHT STANDARDS IAW AR 600-9 AND THE PHYSICAL FITNESS STANDARDS OF AR 350-1, FAILING TO MEET THOSE STANDARDS WILL NOT RESULT IN BEING REMOVED FROM THE COURSE. INSTEAD, SOLDIERS WILL CONTINUE TO RECEIVE TRAINING AND THEIR DA FORM 1059 WILL REFLECT THEIR DEFICIENCIES AS SPECIFIED IN PARAGRAPH 3 ABOVE.

7. THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH WITHIN AR 350-1, PARAGRAPH 3-10, TITLED, "ENROLLMENT DENIALS FOR FAILURE TO MEET HEIGHT AND WEIGHT REQUIREMENTS AND NONACADEMIC DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO MEET ARMY PHYSICAL FITNESS STANDARD" IS NO LONGER APPLICABLE. ALL SOLDIERS PREVIOUSLY DENIED ENROLLMENT FOR APFT FAILURE OR WEIGHT CONTROL WILL BE IMMEDIATELY OTHERWISE CONSIDERED ELIGIBLE FOR COURSE SCHEUDLING, SELECTION AND ATTENDANCE.

8. POC FOR THIS MESSAGE IS XXXXXXX

9. EXPIRATION DATE CANNOT BE DETERMINED AT THIS TIME.


22 Comments

The problem with the body/fat/mass index is that it doesn't work for short stocky people - I mean those that ARE in shape - or big guys. I had a couple of guys in my reserve unit who could hump up a GP medium tent danm near by themselves but who consistantly failed that stupid test. I with you if they can pass the PT test after failing the BM test, they get a go. And no mention in their EER.
 
The secret to BMI is all in the neck. When they do the tape test the bigger your neck the better chane you'll pass (the idea being the size of your "muscles" :P I passed my tape every single time. At 5ft 9 210 lbs I was your typical barrel chested Irishman, but I got taped...even tho I wore a 32 waist. If they taped me now they'd die laughing, but such is the joys of being a PFC :)
 
One of my best Drills in the old BCT days was a twenty-four year old E-6. Two tours with the 9th ID. Something like 4% body fat, black belt in karate and jiujitsu. He had an encyclopedic knowledge of all things infantry and never scored less than the max on any PT test--and back then, we took them every six weeks. During hand-to-hand combat demonstrations, he'd walk past me and kick my hat off my head without breaking stride. Problem was, he was five-foot-six and looked like a fireplug with legs. When he was named Ft. Dix Drill Sergeant of the Year, the brigade commander recommended him for promotion. DA kicked it back and four weeks later, my E-6 was out of the Army--non-selected for retention and RIF'ed--because he "failed to meet Army standards." Bureaucratic a$$hats...
 
Jebus! I just found the Army's ht/wt regs. When I was a 22 year old pro athlete and in the best shape of my life (
 
Well, isn't that special, the server error didn't like the second half of my comment. Jebus! I just found the Army's ht/wt regs. When I was a 22 year old pro athlete and in the best shape of my life (<10% body fat) I'd barely pass those regs. And then only for the non-prior mil experience.
 
Heh. I just remembered a more recent casualty of the Army Beautification Project--one of our Viet Vet aviating, marathon running, APFT maxing Instructor Pilots. Back in the late '70s, in a rather transparent effort to stem the tide of females applying for Flight School, DA increased the minimum height requirement from sixty inches to sixty-four. The new Party Line became, "Anyone shorter than that is physiologically unable to reach the antitorque pedals, so it's actually a safety issue and *not* a transparent attempt to keep wimmin out. Honest." Robby was suddenly two inches too short to fly Army helicopters, so out he went after fifteen-hundred combat hours and ten years in the Guard. So, where did he get a new job? Flying helicopters for the Army as a DA civilian. At Fort Rucker, the Home of Army Aviation. Oh, yeah--DA never addressed the fact that helicopter antitorque pedals are adjustable. At full aft setting in the Hubert, my knees are under my armpits...
 
MMİ - Heh--as a pro athlete, you *might* have made it. With a lot of extra training, of course...
 
Welcome to the Battle of the Bulge Part 2.
 
Jim steps from the shadows, sees his opening and strikes!
 
Anyone who can score 90% on the AFPT should be exempt from any and all tape test qualifications. My degree is in Kinesiology and I can tell you that the BMI is a great test for the massES (no pun intended) but there will always be those in society for whom it does not work - specifically those who have more muscle mass than the average human. To counteract this, the exemption needs to be made for anyone who can score a 90% or better on the AFPT. If you can max out the PT test, I don't give a rats patootie WHAT you look like... - hfs
 
I'm IRR, as my name attests to and I've got until April 30th to make my ht/wt standards to re-up IRR (I'm getting paid to stay IRR as part of a Variable Separation Incentive program). 15lbs to go...
 
In the Canadian Forces we used to have BMI testing, but it got scrapped. I had a buddy who at 5' 9" and 240lbs could beat (formerly) speedy little old me over a sixty-yard dash. Strong as an ox, farmboy-type. When we still had BMI, twice a year he'd pass his fitness test (higher at the military college than the general standard, believe it or not), and twice a year he'd fail the BMI and get sent to NDMC (the head-honcho medical centre in Ottawa) for immersion testing. Which he would always pass, of course, since he wasn't fat, just a horse of a man. I'm pleased to say he's now a signals major, with no more stupid "you're supposed to look like this" pseudo-fitness standards to get past.
 
The only reason I retired vice got fired is my 21 inch neck. Yes, yes. It's true what they say.
 
I had a Light Colonel in my unit at Ft Lewis. Just a shade under 60 years old and up for retirement. He could do the 2 mile run with a 65 lb ruck sack in 14 minutes even. In boots. He used to run at every unit in the Battalions APFT...as motivation... I was 21 at the time and could barely squeeze 13 even...in my sneakers People like that...are insane Hard breathing causes brain damage. Any Marine's here to validate? *grin*
 
The Canadian Army doesn't use BMI any more, too many "exceptions". We now use the Rucksack March: 25kg rucksack, with rifle, helmet and webbing; march 13km in less than 2hr 20min. Over "moderately undulating" terrain. Followed by "fireman's carry" of a buddy over 100m. Cheers JMH
 
A far more useful measure of military fitness.
 
take a guess which end of the spectrum i have always been at: i was a strong advocate of doing the APFT scoring by weight class, and the final event (added after completion of the two mile run) was a wrestling match or 5 rounds of boxing against your boss (his choice). if you could beat the snot outta him, it didn't matter what your tape test or APFT score said. (scrawny little rat weasels...)
 
Just to be evil, you might add a 300m shuttle run in full kit (with water, ammo, etc), too include full body armor. And exactly how big is the buddy you must carry? There was a medic rotated through our training back in Nov-Dec. About 6'7", 350 lbs, no kidding. Boy should be playing in the NFL. He could pick up a guy under each arm and carry them around. Of course, who do you think we assessed as the first 'casualty?' And no, I couldn't even think of carrying that boy. Hell, I'd have a hard time dragging him 25 yards.
 
HL In the Fireman's Carry, you carry him 100m, then he carries you 100m back. Volunteering to carry the little guy might just piss him off. Cheers JMH
 
MAJMike, when I was a young Captain, we had a DIVARTY commander who was a pencil-necked, sunken-chested, marathon-running geek who assumed that because he could eat three plates of spaghetti and not gain weight that my fellow football player and I must be really pigging out. And he wanted to command-refer us to the weight program (even though we were in spec) because, well, he didn't like the way we looked and he could. So, Mike and I put a challenge to him. We'd eat what he did for a month, do PT with him every day, and we'd do a group weigh-in at start and finish. Mike and I predictably gained weight, and while we didn't always keep up with him on the runs because he liked to sprint out just to dick with us, we always finished the runs in a respectable time, something even he agreed to. We then had the good Colonel live like we did, which included weight training. By the end of the month the Colonel had lost 6 pounds. We took him on a run with a twist. We went running on his favorite route, an 8 miler that went to an old german fortification called Alte Veste. He hung with us, no problem. Now comes the trick. The DIVARTY Command Sergeant Major met us there, with three 75 pound rucks, two M60s, and the Colonel's .45. We rucked up, slung the machineguns, and force marched back to Pinder. The Colonel didn't make it. We didn't go on the Fat Boy program.
 
I hate to hear about poor oppressed overweight Soldiers. The Army deploys with more snivel gear than weapons. Their camps are havens of luxury. I have many fond memories of hitting the Army's camps to get good chow, a movie, a hot shower, etc. No time/opportunity to PT? That's pretty far from the mark.
 
this memo seems kind of fishy because i have been looking for the message and i can find prove of it. let me expalin all alaract messages have a number for example "alaract 145/2005" this message does not have one. if this message is real it should have one. milper does not have it either. if some hooah hooah soldier can find it please pos so every one can see that it is a true message not something a fattie post it to get to go to ncoes