<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for How much of a gun nut are you?</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:09:51 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>How much of a gun nut are you?</title>
            <description>Their code is hosed for my installation of Moveable Type (something farked with the table and I don&apos;t feel like troubleshooting it) - so here&apos;s the relevant data, with an edit or two: You Are 96% Gun Nut! You are a true gun nut. The number of guns in your house is probably over five well over 100. All of them are truly effective in your hands. [Well, the ones that are deacts are only effective as bludgeons, and some of them aren&apos;t very handy for that...] Heh. I got one wrong, but I really really really like the wrong...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 09:46:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-03-05</title>
            <description>
                ...but for the life of me I still can&apos;t figure out what it is... and I&apos;m not sure I care.

As for gun writers faking their groups, well that just makes me feel better about not paying much attention to the new stuff!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-42016</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-42016</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 08:53:54 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from OD on 2006-03-05</title>
            <description>
                COme to think of it Neffi, if you did give some other answer for the SA80, but still got 96%, then you must have got &apos;right&apos; the question that me and John got &apos;wrong&apos;.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-42012</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-42012</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 00:57:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from OD on 2006-03-05</title>
            <description>
                I expect you&apos;re right Neffi. I remember that too. Everyone called it the 10mm back then and the first gun that took it was the Bren Ten.

I knew a gun writer once, who wrote for Guns &amp; Ammo. He&apos;d sometimes fake his groups from about zero inches with a latex catapult because he was tired of going to the range. Told me all the gun writers did it. I remember feeling quite disillusioned.

The SA80, apparently, has receiver walls so thin that if you squeeze the top and bottom, you can stop the bolt cycling.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-42011</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-42011</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 00:53:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Neffi on 2006-03-04</title>
            <description>
                mmmmm but I&apos;ll wager the correct answer was &apos;yes&apos;. I remember when the .40 first came out and all the gun magazine writers were creaming themselves over it... those guys have to fill a magazine (the paper kind!) every month, so any new item gets headlines. Talk and talk and talk about which caliber is the superior &apos;man-stopper&apos;... enuff to makes ya sick, I say- sick!
And nary a word about practicing your fast-draw and placing a quick double-tap into center mass; and how that makes the whole question moot so long as you&apos;re shooting at least a .380 with special ammo.
WHAT?! The charging handle on the SA80 reciprocates with the bolt?!!! What kinda shoddy engineering is that!!!!
OK, rant over. Go about yer binness...

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-42000</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-42000</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 18:24:53 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-03-04</title>
            <description>
                Not only does it matter by how you define it, it also varies by bullet weight and powder load.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41988</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41988</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 16:08:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from OD on 2006-03-04</title>
            <description>
                Did you say the .40&quot; was more effective than the 9mm? I guess that&apos;s a matter of opinion - depends what he means by effective.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41986</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41986</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 15:49:36 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from OD on 2006-03-04</title>
            <description>
                Haha, I know, I was wondering what a happily-married man like yourself was doing there:)
...though I realise it&apos;s just because you got the gun test link.

They wouldn&apos;t initially give me my results because I unchecked the box &quot;looking for new friends&quot;.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41984</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41984</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 15:39:19 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-03-04</title>
            <description>
                I&apos;m not sure Owen - I put in the same answer you did for the SA80, and the M16 *is* a gas tube, direct impingement system.

All of those pistols are detecable by metal detectors.

And those are the answers the test writer was looking for.  I went back, took it again with different answers, and go lower scores.  For the nonce, I&apos;m going with bollixed test.  

On a whim, I registered with OKCupid (the source of the test) and am going to take a crack at it.

However, it&apos;s really an annoying &quot;matching service&quot; that, oddly enough, gets a little grumpy when you say you&apos;re married and not looking for anything...  8^)

(That sound is SWWBO scurrying to check up on me)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41980</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41980</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 15:16:13 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from OD on 2006-03-04</title>
            <description>
                I also got 96% and don&apos;t know where I went wrong. I thought maybe it was the M16 where I said gas tube. Could it be direct gas action is the answer they want? Or maybe it&apos;s metal detectors, where I said &quot;none&quot;.

The correct answer to the SA80 is that you can&apos;t fire it left-handed or the cocking handle will hit your cheek.

As for the test being a crock, don&apos;t forget that a completely uninformed person taking a three-choice multiple-choice quiz would expect to average 33%. So 37% is not abnormal. 51% suggests you know a bit more than you think, probably from hanging around here. But it&apos;s still possible to score that high with random answers.

Where d&apos;you think you went wrong, John? Or maybe you were right and the quiz-writer is wrong?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41978</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41978</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 15:09:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Maggie on 2006-03-04</title>
            <description>
                This test is a crock!  Here are my results.

Plinker
You are 51% of a gun nut! 

I have never refired a gun in my life.  The only time I even had my hand on one was when I was making out with a State Trooper on our way into a restaurant.  I doubt that counts.  For every question with 3 possible answers, I picked the middle answer.  The only questions that I was able to answer with confidence were the ones pertaining to my gender and date of birth.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41977</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41977</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 14:14:11 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-03-04</title>
            <description>
                Depends.  What was your answer to the SA80 question?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41976</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41976</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 13:59:06 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Neffi on 2006-03-04</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[96% my own self- musta been that SA80 question... them thar modern gizmos ain't my cup o' tea. And way to go, Lioness- we'll have you corrup... er, I mean <i>educated</i> yet!]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41975</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41975</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 13:55:11 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-03-04</title>
            <description>
                Yeah, but ya hang around here (which is safer than hanging around those dives down by the docks, btw), so obviously some stuff has seeped in.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41972</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41972</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:09:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Fuzzybear Lioness on 2006-03-04</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<b><i>Plinker</i></b>
You are 37% of a gun nut!

You're probably either a seasonal hunter or someone with a decent head knowledge of guns. Keep working at it, and you could really be a force to be reckoned with!

ROFL!  I've never ever laid a hand on a gun!]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41971</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41971</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:06:26 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cowboy Blob on 2006-03-04</title>
            <description>
                You might not have got one wrong.  I scored a 93%, but that doesn&apos;t turn out to be mathematically right, since 20/21= .95-something and 19/21= .90-something.  I don&apos;t know if the site times your test, but don&apos;t beat yourself up over a test with some internal monkey math.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41970</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41970</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 11:07:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

