<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you_atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-</id>
  <updated>2008-08-03T17:09:51Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for How much of a gun nut are you?</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5425" title="How much of a gun nut are you?" />
    <published>2006-03-04T15:46:33Z</published>
    <updated>2006-11-11T16:53:28Z</updated>
    <title>How much of a gun nut are you?</title>
    <summary>Their code is hosed for my installation of Moveable Type (something farked with the table and I don&apos;t feel like troubleshooting it) - so here&apos;s the relevant data, with an edit or two: You Are 96% Gun Nut! You are a true gun nut. The number of guns in your house is probably over five well over 100. All of them are truly effective in your hands. [Well, the ones that are deacts are only effective as bludgeons, and some of them aren&apos;t very handy for that...] Heh. I got one wrong, but I really really really like the wrong...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>The Armorer</name>
      <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Gun Rights" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Their code is hosed for my installation of Moveable Type (something farked with the table and I don't feel like troubleshooting it) - so here's the relevant data, with an edit or two:</p>

<blockquote>
<b>You Are 96% Gun Nut</b>!

<p>You are a true gun nut. The number of guns in your house is <s>probably over five</s> well over 100. All of them are truly effective in your hands. [Well, the ones that are deacts are only effective as bludgeons, and some of them aren't very handy for that...]  <br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>Heh.  I got one wrong, but I really really really like the wrong answer, because I've got no idea which one I got wrong.   </p>

<p><b><a href="http://www.okcupid.com/tests/take?testid=1824039521290665504">Take the test yourself by clicking here</a></b>.</p>

<p>H/t, <b><a href="http://cowboyblob.blogspot.com/2006/03/better-than-zogby-at-least.html">Cowboy Blob</a></b>.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-comment:42016</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-42016" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-03-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        ...but for the life of me I still can&apos;t figure out what it is... and I&apos;m not sure I care.

As for gun writers faking their groups, well that just makes me feel better about not paying much attention to the new stuff!
    </content>
    <published>2006-03-05T14:53:54Z</published>
    <updated>2006-03-05T14:53:54Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-comment:42012</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-42012" />
    <title>Comment from OD on 2006-03-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>OD</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        COme to think of it Neffi, if you did give some other answer for the SA80, but still got 96%, then you must have got &apos;right&apos; the question that me and John got &apos;wrong&apos;.
    </content>
    <published>2006-03-05T06:57:40Z</published>
    <updated>2006-03-05T06:57:40Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-comment:42011</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-42011" />
    <title>Comment from OD on 2006-03-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>OD</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        I expect you&apos;re right Neffi. I remember that too. Everyone called it the 10mm back then and the first gun that took it was the Bren Ten.

I knew a gun writer once, who wrote for Guns &amp; Ammo. He&apos;d sometimes fake his groups from about zero inches with a latex catapult because he was tired of going to the range. Told me all the gun writers did it. I remember feeling quite disillusioned.

The SA80, apparently, has receiver walls so thin that if you squeeze the top and bottom, you can stop the bolt cycling.
    </content>
    <published>2006-03-05T06:53:05Z</published>
    <updated>2006-03-05T06:53:05Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-comment:42000</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-42000" />
    <title>Comment from Neffi on 2006-03-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Neffi</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        mmmmm but I&apos;ll wager the correct answer was &apos;yes&apos;. I remember when the .40 first came out and all the gun magazine writers were creaming themselves over it... those guys have to fill a magazine (the paper kind!) every month, so any new item gets headlines. Talk and talk and talk about which caliber is the superior &apos;man-stopper&apos;... enuff to makes ya sick, I say- sick!
And nary a word about practicing your fast-draw and placing a quick double-tap into center mass; and how that makes the whole question moot so long as you&apos;re shooting at least a .380 with special ammo.
WHAT?! The charging handle on the SA80 reciprocates with the bolt?!!! What kinda shoddy engineering is that!!!!
OK, rant over. Go about yer binness...

    </content>
    <published>2006-03-05T00:24:53Z</published>
    <updated>2006-03-05T00:24:53Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-comment:41988</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41988" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-03-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        Not only does it matter by how you define it, it also varies by bullet weight and powder load.
    </content>
    <published>2006-03-04T22:08:42Z</published>
    <updated>2006-03-04T22:08:42Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-comment:41986</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41986" />
    <title>Comment from OD on 2006-03-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>OD</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        Did you say the .40&quot; was more effective than the 9mm? I guess that&apos;s a matter of opinion - depends what he means by effective.
    </content>
    <published>2006-03-04T21:49:36Z</published>
    <updated>2006-03-04T21:49:36Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-comment:41984</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41984" />
    <title>Comment from OD on 2006-03-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>OD</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        Haha, I know, I was wondering what a happily-married man like yourself was doing there:)
...though I realise it&apos;s just because you got the gun test link.

They wouldn&apos;t initially give me my results because I unchecked the box &quot;looking for new friends&quot;.
    </content>
    <published>2006-03-04T21:39:19Z</published>
    <updated>2006-03-04T21:39:19Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-comment:41980</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41980" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-03-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        I&apos;m not sure Owen - I put in the same answer you did for the SA80, and the M16 *is* a gas tube, direct impingement system.

All of those pistols are detecable by metal detectors.

And those are the answers the test writer was looking for.  I went back, took it again with different answers, and go lower scores.  For the nonce, I&apos;m going with bollixed test.  

On a whim, I registered with OKCupid (the source of the test) and am going to take a crack at it.

However, it&apos;s really an annoying &quot;matching service&quot; that, oddly enough, gets a little grumpy when you say you&apos;re married and not looking for anything...  8^)

(That sound is SWWBO scurrying to check up on me)
    </content>
    <published>2006-03-04T21:16:13Z</published>
    <updated>2006-03-04T21:16:13Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-comment:41978</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41978" />
    <title>Comment from OD on 2006-03-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>OD</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        I also got 96% and don&apos;t know where I went wrong. I thought maybe it was the M16 where I said gas tube. Could it be direct gas action is the answer they want? Or maybe it&apos;s metal detectors, where I said &quot;none&quot;.

The correct answer to the SA80 is that you can&apos;t fire it left-handed or the cocking handle will hit your cheek.

As for the test being a crock, don&apos;t forget that a completely uninformed person taking a three-choice multiple-choice quiz would expect to average 33%. So 37% is not abnormal. 51% suggests you know a bit more than you think, probably from hanging around here. But it&apos;s still possible to score that high with random answers.

Where d&apos;you think you went wrong, John? Or maybe you were right and the quiz-writer is wrong?
    </content>
    <published>2006-03-04T21:09:43Z</published>
    <updated>2006-03-04T21:09:43Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-comment:41977</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41977" />
    <title>Comment from Maggie on 2006-03-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Maggie</name>
        <uri>http://bostonmaggie.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://bostonmaggie.blogspot.com">
        This test is a crock!  Here are my results.

Plinker
You are 51% of a gun nut! 

I have never refired a gun in my life.  The only time I even had my hand on one was when I was making out with a State Trooper on our way into a restaurant.  I doubt that counts.  For every question with 3 possible answers, I picked the middle answer.  The only questions that I was able to answer with confidence were the ones pertaining to my gender and date of birth.
    </content>
    <published>2006-03-04T20:14:11Z</published>
    <updated>2006-03-04T20:14:11Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-comment:41976</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41976" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-03-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        Depends.  What was your answer to the SA80 question?
    </content>
    <published>2006-03-04T19:59:06Z</published>
    <updated>2006-03-04T19:59:06Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-comment:41975</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41975" />
    <title>Comment from Neffi on 2006-03-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Neffi</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[96% my own self- musta been that SA80 question... them thar modern gizmos ain't my cup o' tea. And way to go, Lioness- we'll have you corrup... er, I mean <i>educated</i> yet!]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-03-04T19:55:11Z</published>
    <updated>2006-03-04T19:55:11Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-comment:41972</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41972" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-03-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        Yeah, but ya hang around here (which is safer than hanging around those dives down by the docks, btw), so obviously some stuff has seeped in.
    </content>
    <published>2006-03-04T18:09:08Z</published>
    <updated>2006-03-04T18:09:08Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-comment:41971</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41971" />
    <title>Comment from Fuzzybear Lioness on 2006-03-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Fuzzybear Lioness</name>
        <uri>http://www.fuzzilicious.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.fuzzilicious.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<b><i>Plinker</i></b>
You are 37% of a gun nut!

You're probably either a seasonal hunter or someone with a decent head knowledge of guns. Keep working at it, and you could really be a force to be reckoned with!

ROFL!  I've never ever laid a hand on a gun!]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-03-04T18:06:26Z</published>
    <updated>2006-03-04T18:06:26Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425-comment:41970</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5425" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/how_much_of_a_gun_nut_are_you.html#comment-41970" />
    <title>Comment from Cowboy Blob on 2006-03-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cowboy Blob</name>
        <uri>http://cowboyblob.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://cowboyblob.blogspot.com">
        You might not have got one wrong.  I scored a 93%, but that doesn&apos;t turn out to be mathematically right, since 20/21= .95-something and 19/21= .90-something.  I don&apos;t know if the site times your test, but don&apos;t beat yourself up over a test with some internal monkey math.
    </content>
    <published>2006-03-04T17:07:41Z</published>
    <updated>2006-03-04T17:07:41Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
</feed>

