<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Hmmm.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:05:15 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Hmmm.</title>
            <description>From an email: Interesting Year 1981: 1. Prince Charles got married. 2 . Liverpool crowned soccer champions of Europe. 3. Australia lost the Ashes tournament. 4. Pope died. (Where&apos;s the before-you-post-it fact checker?) Interesting year 2005: 1. Prince Charles got married. 2. Liverpool crowned soccer champions of Europe. 3. Australia lost the Ashes tournament. 4. Pope died. Lesson learned? - The next time Charles gets married, someone warn the pope. As Bill notes - bet the farm on Liverpool....</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 02:03:31 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from ry on 2006-03-30</title>
            <description>
                (Okay, I know it&apos;s bad form and all to pick on our northern cousins, but....)
THe Canadians have WORKING submarines?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43299</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43299</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 21:21:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Maggie on 2006-03-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<i>"mackerel snappers"...</i>

lol!  I remember people in my neighborhood calling each other that!  One of those cases where the offended group appropriates the slur for themselves.

As far as the sailors and the convent story.............clearly that was incorrect information.  Brahmin propaganda unfairly impugning good sailors.

Who are you calling a groupie?  The rotation happens to welcome all branches of the military.  My ex was an MP out of Fort Hamilton.  There's a JetBlue pilot that makes a point of taking me to dinner whenever he is in Boston and he was in the Air Force for 15 years.  Why last summer there was even a submariner from the <i>Canadian</i> Navy who was on an exchange program in Newport.  I am an equal opportunity Princess.
]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43277</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43277</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:03:06 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-03-30</title>
            <description>
                Yup.

But that happened post-Civil War, when word got out that you could eat fish in the Navy and nobody would give it a second thought. But even during WWII, Catholics in the Navy still rejoiced in the sobriquet &quot;mackerel snappers&quot;...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43260</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43260</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 06:24:50 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-03-30</title>
            <description>
                Bill - IIRC, the Navy was for a long time the most &apos;catholic&apos; of the services, the Army officer corps being a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Anglicans and Methodists...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43258</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43258</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:44:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-03-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The <i>Catholic</i> Historian?

Feh!  Fie!

Ah, well. ]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43256</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43256</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:31:58 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-03-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<i>An unruly, drunken mob of laborers, sailors, apprentices, and hoodlums gathered at the gates of the convent.</i>

Hmmmpf--and you a Navy groupie.

The same bunch tried to burn St. Rose Church a couple of nights later and were driven off by fifty cops and *Army* militia...]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43255</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43255</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 23:19:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Maggie on 2006-03-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Chief - Catherine of Aragon?  That's a long time to hold a grudge.  I'm fine with that one.

However, me and mine still find<a href="http://www.massmoments.org/moment.cfm?mid=234" rel="nofollow"><b> this</b></a> a sore spot.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43253</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43253</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:59:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-03-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Jim - I take it the "Catholic historian" is still horked about Hank the Eighth and that <a href="http://www.nhc.rtp.nc.us:8080/tserve/eighteen/ekeyinfo/chureng.htm" rel="nofollow"><b>whole Catherine of Aragon thing</b></a>...]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43245</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43245</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:50:27 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from JimC on 2006-03-29</title>
            <description>
                Sorry, John I corrected him from whom you got this tidbit.  Should have done a send to all rather than just the Catholic historian who perpetrated this woeful attempt at humor.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43244</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43244</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:24:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Fuzzybear Lioness on 2006-03-29</title>
            <description>
                *sluuurp!*
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43237</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43237</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:11:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-03-29</title>
            <description>
                Ry - You&apos;re not supposed to mention *licking* with FbL lurking about.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43236</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43236</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:02:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from ry on 2006-03-29</title>
            <description>
                (Along the lines of the old Timex commercial)
Pope JP2, takes a licking and keeps on ticking.  
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43224</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43224</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:35:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-03-29</title>
            <description>
                Supposedly, the pickup line Charles delivered to Di was, &quot;If you think my *ears* are big...&quot;
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43223</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43223</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:59:31 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Maggie on 2006-03-29</title>
            <description>
                Chief!  You beat me to it!  John Paul I died in 1978.  My favorite Prince Charles joke was one where Princess Diana supposedly says &quot;Prince Charles proves that not all rulers are twelve inches.&quot; *delivered with snotty English accent*
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43220</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43220</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:27:19 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-03-29</title>
            <description>
                My take on it is, any time Charles gets married, bet the ranch on Liverpool...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43214</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43214</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 07:57:23 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-03-29</title>
            <description>
                The Pope didn&apos;t die in 1981. John Paul II was *shot* four times, but he survived the assassination attempt...


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43212</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/hmmm.html#comment-43212</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 07:51:47 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

