<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Armor Pr0n.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:09:09 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Armor Pr0n.</title>
            <description>Light Armor, to be sure. U.S. Army SSgt. William Black performs Squad Leader duties onboard a Stryker combat vehicle with 2nd. Battalion, 1st. Infantry Regiment, 172nd. Infantry Brigade, patrol Mosul, Iraq, Feb. 14, 2006. (U.S. Air Force photo byTech. Sgt. John M. Foster) (Released) Still taking reader submissions for Friday, if anyone is interested....</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:45:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-03-15</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<i>A lot of folks don't realise how much failed military hardware (failed is actually not a good word to use, I know) ends up on the civilian counters.</i>

One of my buds used to work at the Property Disposal Office (aka, the Original Army/Navy Store) at Lakehurst. He could always tell when a shipment of prototypes arrived from the 'lectronic labs at Monmouth because nobody had a clue as to what they were or had been designed to do--even after reading the descriptions.

And he wouldn't let me play with the Star Wars stuff, the bassett. Said they were still trying to figure out how to tell the Base Commander where the hole in <a href="http://www.nlhs.com/images/hangar-1/big_one_side_view.jpg" rel="nofollow"><b>Hangar No. 1</b></a> came from...  ]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42509</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42509</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:30:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BloodSpite on 2006-03-15</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Engineer stuff would be cool

I was going to suggest Experimental stuff myself. A lot of folks don't realise how much failed military hardware (failed is actually not a good word to use, I know) ends up on the civilian counters.


<a href="http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/armyweapons/a/arwater.htm" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/armyweapons/a/arwater.htm" rel="nofollow">Things">http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/armyweapons/a/arwater.htm">Things</a> like the new Water Generating Exhaust system for the HHMVW</a>

Stuff like that might draw some intrested folks, and even folks who don't realise just how much military research benefits everyone else.

Just my thoughts anyway
]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42505</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42505</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:55:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Heartless Libertarian on 2006-03-15</title>
            <description>
                Oh, and I don&apos;t have any pics myself, but how about Engineer pr0n for the unclaimed day?

Blowing stuff up all up close and personal like.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42503</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42503</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:29:27 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Heartless Libertarian on 2006-03-15</title>
            <description>
                And note that he&apos;s maintaining a proper eyeball defilade behind that shield, too.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42502</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42502</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:26:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from KCSteve on 2006-03-15</title>
            <description>
                I notice there&apos;s the mark of at least one direct hit on the shield he&apos;s standing behind.  Good thing it&apos;s there!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42501</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42501</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:15:13 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-03-15</title>
            <description>
                Yer stuck in the past, MajMike.  This is the future!

Heh.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42499</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42499</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:32:11 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MajMike on 2006-03-15</title>
            <description>
                oh now really!!  i was expecting some armor pr0n, not this kiddie stuff.  i likes em big!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42498</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42498</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:13:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Heartless Libertarian on 2006-03-15</title>
            <description>
                If you&apos;re refering to that little widget adjacent to the driver&apos;s hatch, I believe it&apos;s the driver&apos;s night vision system.  Neat thing, it&apos;s thermal instead of light amplification.

They ID the unit as 2-1 IN, but to the best of my recollection, it was the engineer variants that had the DNV mounted in that position, so it could see over the plow or rollers.  Other variants had the DNV in front of the driver&apos;s hatch.  Then again, they may have moved it on later production models to make it all the same.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42492</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42492</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:21:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-03-15</title>
            <description>
                Chuck, I don&apos;t know what the &quot;barreled object&quot; is, except I&apos;m pretty sure it&apos;s not a weapon.

Unless I&apos;m mistaken (I&apos;ll defer to Stryker soldiers) the big vertical bit is a wire breaker.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42482</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42482</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:19:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Chuck Simmins on 2006-03-15</title>
            <description>
                What is the barrelled object in the lower right? A sight or a weapon?

What&apos;s the big piece of steel standing vertical in front of the soldier?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42481</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/03/armor_pr0n.html#comment-42481</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 08:41:30 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

