<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Y&apos;know, it just ain&apos;t right...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:12:06 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Y&apos;know, it just ain&apos;t right...</title>
            <description> ...when the holdings of the Arsenal at Castle Argghhh! include Bill the Rotorhead&apos;s favorite small arm (no ladies, not *that* one - see 27&quot; zipper), as he opined in the comments of a post earlier this week: Blake - The M3 was handy for cleaning out bunkers, but you had to get within fifteen feet of a firing port to do it properly. A 2.75&quot; FFAR from 500 meters would do the same thing, albeit without that *personal* touch. Heh. I *love* the M3. And we don&apos;t have one in the Holdings of the Arsenal of Argghhh!. 2.75&quot; FFARs...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 07:24:21 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Blake Kirk on 2006-02-02</title>
            <description>
                Thanks, Bill.  That explanation does make sense.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html#comment-40011</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html#comment-40011</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:22:53 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-02-01</title>
            <description>
                A sectioned 17-pounder! Neat--now you&apos;ve gotta work on getting an MPSM and a flechette. I&apos;ve got a couple of practice rockets that were modified for EMI testing in the late &apos;80s--they look weird, but they worked. Plus some dummy 10-pounders...

Blake - The main problem with that system had to do with exterior ballistics as the rockets left the tube. A rocket orients into the prevailing wind after launch and drifts. A helicopter compensates for this by launching in forward flight for direct fire. Since the old Mk 40 was fairly slow leaving the tube, it was affected pretty radically by a stiff crosswind, so we tried to orient into the wind for firing whenever feasible.

It&apos;s a whole new ball of wax for Mk 40 indirect fire--rocket dispersion increased dramatically. The switch to the Mk 66 solved an awful lot of problems, but we still had to use firing tables, compensate for wind and shoot using a &quot;rocking horse&quot; maneuver--launch when you&apos;re hanging by your nose a split second before you fall backwards to a hover. Dispersion isn&apos;t as great when you&apos;re able to orient into the wind, and you don&apos;t always have that luxury in a ground vehicle. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html#comment-39955</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html#comment-39955</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:50:26 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from blake.kirk on 2006-02-01</title>
            <description>
                A bunch of years ago, there was a prototype running around of a multiple-launch rocket system for light forces based on the 70mm/2.75&quot; rocket.  The one version I saw had six standard 19-shot pods mounted in a framework on a modified 1/4-ton trailer chassis.  I think it used a high-end (for the time) pocket calculator to do the firing computations, rather like the early mortar computers.

Me I rather liked the idea.  I was still light infantry at the time, and I figured anything that beefed up our firepower while still being easliy moved around was a Good Thing.  But it was a private venture, and Wasn&apos;t Invented Here, and so went nowhere.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html#comment-39945</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html#comment-39945</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:01:20 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MajMike on 2006-02-01</title>
            <description>
                ahh, the good old greaser...

loved that piece.  such a shame when we made those go away during the transition from -60 series panzers to the Abrams.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html#comment-39936</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html#comment-39936</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 08:51:35 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2006-02-01</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bristol.ca/CRV7Rocket.html" rel="nofollow">CRV7</a>

Cheers
JMH]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html#comment-39935</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html#comment-39935</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 08:47:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

