<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right_atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5231-</id>
  <updated>2008-08-03T17:12:05Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Y&apos;know, it just ain&apos;t right...</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5231</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5231" title="Y'know, it just ain't right..." />
    <published>2006-02-01T13:24:21Z</published>
    <updated>2006-11-11T16:53:24Z</updated>
    <title>Y&apos;know, it just ain&apos;t right...</title>
    <summary> ...when the holdings of the Arsenal at Castle Argghhh! include Bill the Rotorhead&apos;s favorite small arm (no ladies, not *that* one - see 27&quot; zipper), as he opined in the comments of a post earlier this week: Blake - The M3 was handy for cleaning out bunkers, but you had to get within fifteen feet of a firing port to do it properly. A 2.75&quot; FFAR from 500 meters would do the same thing, albeit without that *personal* touch. Heh. I *love* the M3. And we don&apos;t have one in the Holdings of the Arsenal of Argghhh!. 2.75&quot; FFARs...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>The Armorer</name>
      <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Gun Pr0n - A Naughty Expose&apos; of the fiddly bits" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.fototime.com/C74890646ED83A1/orig.jpg" border=0 alt="Twitchy Bill's favorite 'small arm'"></p>

<p>...when the holdings of the Arsenal at Castle Argghhh! include Bill the Rotorhead's favorite small arm (no ladies, not *that* one - see 27" zipper), as he opined in the comments of a post earlier this week:</p>

<blockquote>
<i>Blake - The M3 was handy for cleaning out bunkers, but you had to get within fifteen feet of a firing port to do it properly. A 2.75" FFAR from 500 meters would do the same thing, albeit without that *personal* touch. </i>
</blockquote>

<p>Heh. I *love* <b><a href="http://www.rt66.com/~korteng/SmallArms/grease.htm"target=_blank>the M3</a></b>.  And we don't have one in the Holdings of the Arsenal of Argghhh!.  <a href="http://www.fototime.com/B9FE8A227030EEE/standard.jpg"target=_blank><b>2.75" FFARs we have</b></a>.  <b><a href="http://www.fototime.com/32B18FC83960288/standard.jpg"target=_blank>Two of 'em</a></b>.  One with a <b><a href="http://www.fototime.com/477EB7910EF2859/standard.jpg"target=_blank>neat sectioned warhead</a></b>.</p>

<p>Mebbe it *is* time to put up a Paypal Button to <b><a href="http://www.valkyriearms.com/m3.htm"target=_blank>buy the Arsenal one of these</a></b>.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5231-comment:40011</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5231" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html#comment-40011" />
    <title>Comment from Blake Kirk on 2006-02-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Blake Kirk</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        Thanks, Bill.  That explanation does make sense.
    </content>
    <published>2006-02-02T14:22:53Z</published>
    <updated>2006-02-02T14:22:53Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5231-comment:39955</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5231" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html#comment-39955" />
    <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-02-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>cw4(ret)billt</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        A sectioned 17-pounder! Neat--now you&apos;ve gotta work on getting an MPSM and a flechette. I&apos;ve got a couple of practice rockets that were modified for EMI testing in the late &apos;80s--they look weird, but they worked. Plus some dummy 10-pounders...

Blake - The main problem with that system had to do with exterior ballistics as the rockets left the tube. A rocket orients into the prevailing wind after launch and drifts. A helicopter compensates for this by launching in forward flight for direct fire. Since the old Mk 40 was fairly slow leaving the tube, it was affected pretty radically by a stiff crosswind, so we tried to orient into the wind for firing whenever feasible.

It&apos;s a whole new ball of wax for Mk 40 indirect fire--rocket dispersion increased dramatically. The switch to the Mk 66 solved an awful lot of problems, but we still had to use firing tables, compensate for wind and shoot using a &quot;rocking horse&quot; maneuver--launch when you&apos;re hanging by your nose a split second before you fall backwards to a hover. Dispersion isn&apos;t as great when you&apos;re able to orient into the wind, and you don&apos;t always have that luxury in a ground vehicle. 
    </content>
    <published>2006-02-01T18:50:26Z</published>
    <updated>2006-02-01T18:50:26Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5231-comment:39945</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5231" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html#comment-39945" />
    <title>Comment from blake.kirk on 2006-02-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>blake.kirk</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        A bunch of years ago, there was a prototype running around of a multiple-launch rocket system for light forces based on the 70mm/2.75&quot; rocket.  The one version I saw had six standard 19-shot pods mounted in a framework on a modified 1/4-ton trailer chassis.  I think it used a high-end (for the time) pocket calculator to do the firing computations, rather like the early mortar computers.

Me I rather liked the idea.  I was still light infantry at the time, and I figured anything that beefed up our firepower while still being easliy moved around was a Good Thing.  But it was a private venture, and Wasn&apos;t Invented Here, and so went nowhere.
    </content>
    <published>2006-02-01T17:01:20Z</published>
    <updated>2006-02-01T17:01:20Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5231-comment:39936</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5231" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html#comment-39936" />
    <title>Comment from MajMike on 2006-02-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>MajMike</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        ahh, the good old greaser...

loved that piece.  such a shame when we made those go away during the transition from -60 series panzers to the Abrams.
    </content>
    <published>2006-02-01T14:51:35Z</published>
    <updated>2006-02-01T14:51:35Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5231-comment:39935</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2006://1.5231" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/02/yknow_it_just_aint_right.html#comment-39935" />
    <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2006-02-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>J.M. Heinrichs</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bristol.ca/CRV7Rocket.html" rel="nofollow">CRV7</a>

Cheers
JMH]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-02-01T14:47:40Z</published>
    <updated>2006-02-01T14:47:40Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
</feed>

