previous post next post  

Interesting how *this* spins.

Drudge teases: COAST GUARD RAISED CONCERNS ABOUT PORTS DEAL...

Indeed, the Coast Guard appears to have done just that.

Feb 27, 4:03 PM (ET)

By LIZ SIDOTI

WASHINGTON (AP) - Citing broad gaps in U.S. intelligence, the Coast Guard cautioned the Bush administration that it was unable to determine whether a United Arab Emirates-owned company might support terrorist operations, a Senate panel said Monday.

Indeed.

But - as the article points out - the gaps apply to both Dubai Ports World... *and* the incumbent, P&O Steamship Company.

"There are many intelligence gaps, concerning the potential for DPW or P&O assets to support terrorist operations, that precludes an overall threat assessment of the potential" merger," an undated Coast Guard intelligence assessment says.

Senator Collins notes this:

"This report suggests there were significant and troubling intelligence gaps," said Collins, R-Maine. "That language is very troubling to me."

Wonder which way *she* leans on the NSA Program...

Well, at least we're starting to get where *I'd* like the focus to go - not on the flipping DPW's ownership - but just how good is federal, state, and local oversight of the security issues - and if they are inadequate, will this President ask for the resources to make them sufficient, and will this Congress allow the intelligence agencies to "bridge those gaps?"

Read the whole thing here.

2 Trackbacks

TrackBack this entry at http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-tb.cgi/5324

Coast Guard warns of intel gaps related to ports deal from Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator on February 28, 2006 8:46 AM

Citing broad gaps in U.S. intelligence, the Coast Guard cautioned the Bush administration that it wa Read More

Here’s what’s caught my eye this morning: John Donovan of Argghhh! has the right end of the stick on the ports controversy:  concentrate more on the security, less on the ownership. So, who do we offend next? Sad but too true:  Microsoft... Read More

1 Comments

"The Coast Guard said the concerns reflected in the document ultimately were addressed. In a statement, the Coast Guard said other U.S. intelligence agencies were able to provide answers to the questions it raised." Found here: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060227/ap_on_go_ot/ports_security Cheers JMH
 
© 2008 John Donovan
All rights reserved.