<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Military News of Note.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:56:51 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Military News of Note.</title>
            <description>Here&apos;s a story that will no doubt put some academic knickers in a twist - colleges and universities are actually coming to visit Fort Leavenworth to see how we&apos;re building the new classroom building for the Command and General Staff College - the Lewis and Clark Center. A moving target, pushing the state of the art as we go. I would note that the construction features mentioned have Oklahoma City, and not the New Madrid fault, in mind. The article here makes this sound almost like a new invention... I&apos;m guessing the Vultures among us could rule on that -...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:27:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from April on 2006-01-26</title>
            <description>
                Ummmm, ok, ry.  That puts it in a different perspective.  If he only means no parades in LA, I&apos;ll accept that.

Still, I get the feeling that he would begrudge a veteran&apos;s parade anywhere.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39596</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39596</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:11:54 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from ry on 2006-01-26</title>
            <description>
                Okay, Stein&apos;s a twit.  He&apos;s got his head so far up his behind he can taste his own tonsils.  
But, &quot;But please no parades. Seriously, the traffic is insufferable.&quot;, is not self centered.  

Not in LA.  I405 is a parking lot all day(I&apos;ve been stuck there at 4am).  THere isn&apos;t a period in the day when that freeway flows well at all once you get past Long Beach airport(transition from OC to LA).  Much of LA is like that, even the surface streets.  Remember, he lives in and writes primarily for a Los Angeles audience---it&apos;s a bit of local humor(ask Lex about the Tool song he loves to work out to so much.  Like the song, it&apos;s just something you have to lived to get).  

Tie Stein to a chair fitted with three thousand bottle rockets so he can be the Chinese astronaut that he is, but don&apos;t bust him for using a local thing in an oped that ran in a local paper and you don&apos;t get.  That isn&apos;t fair(and I think John says we believe in fair around here.  Umpire?).

Hold the parade in San Diego---they&apos;d appreciate it---or San Francisco--where it&apos;d piss them all off and nobody is supposed to drive anyways---or Orange County, where they miss having El Toro MCAS and would love to see some uniformed personel.  
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39583</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39583</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:43:00 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from R Jewell on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Being on the Recovery Team was always a hoot.

<a href="http://www.geronimos.org/Pachyderm/Pachygallery/Page_1x.htm" rel="nofollow">Click here to see a Hook Hooking a Hook.</a>

526 is still in the inventory, though upgraded and with a new tail number.
]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39539</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39539</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:39:28 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from April on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                From the Stein interview:

&quot;But please no parades. Seriously, the traffic is insufferable.&quot; 

This is just stunningly self-centered.  I try to avoid name-calling, but, sheesh!  What a whiny, sniveling, twit.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39536</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39536</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:13:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from jim b on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                was that:

On
Line 
Demand 

Failed
Aircraft
Recovery
Team
?


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39530</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39530</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:27:16 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                I never felt really comfortable doing slingloads. Never punched the load off by accident, either, but I know how it can happen...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39529</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39529</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:23:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                Oh, fine. *More* age snarks...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39528</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39528</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:16:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                Failed
Aircraft
Recovery
Team

The job stinks, but somebody&apos;s gotta do it....
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39527</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39527</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:08:39 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from jim b on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                I have been there when helos have dropped stuff. I think my favorite was when they dropped the water buffalo from about 100 feet up.

Biggestgoldanged water balloon I have ever seen.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39526</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39526</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:06:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from V15 on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                V29 - But Triple Nickel looked *soooo* graceful as it augered in.

And you&apos;ve gotta admit, the recovery straps streamered beautifully. I always wondered if the clevis survived the explosion...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39523</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39523</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:38:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from jim b on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                And now a politically incorrect light moment.

In the Italian Army they have two size helos.

The bigga ones ... they fly by and go ...
WOP WOP WOP WOP.

Anda the littla ones .... you can hear them as well.....ginnieginnieginnieginnie
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39519</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39519</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:27:30 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                I see Jim and I are connecting *waaay* to close for my comfort!  Same time, same concept.


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39518</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39518</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:27:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MAWK on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                *grin*
Yep.  I&apos;ll fix &apos;em right up.... no problema.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39516</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39516</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:23:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from V29 on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                Great concept.. I think. But, it&apos;s all for naught when the darn Hook boys drop the aircraft they are recovering. Saw it happen once. Not a nice sight!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39512</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39512</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:12:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                It&apos;s a brawl, it&apos;s vulgar! It&apos;s life on the edge!

Cheers

Basic Recovery of Aircraft Without Landings?

JMH
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39511</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39511</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:10:53 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                Thought you were supposed to be lending *dignity* to this...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39509</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39509</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:03:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                Malfunctioning Aircwaft Wescue Kwew?


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39507</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39507</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:57:56 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from jim b on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                What about Broken Airplane Repair Force  BARF?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39505</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39505</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:55:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                Broken Aircraft Recovery Force.




            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39504</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39504</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:55:31 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                BART has too many overtones of the Simpsoms (although the patch would be a collector&apos;s item).

We need to keep the acronym cool.

*Dead* Aircraft Recovery Team...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39502</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39502</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:39:50 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                Up here, the DART has generally been the Disaster Assistance Relief Team.

How about the Broken Aircraft Recovery Crew?

Cheers
JMH
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39501</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39501</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:32:48 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                I think we need to generate a number one Google hit for Joel Stein.

How about &quot;vacuous pretentious twit&quot; for starts?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39500</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39500</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:31:46 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<i>Crocitto activated the Aircraft Support Equipment, or ASE platoon, May 31. The platoon was designed to focus entirely on DART missions, one of the company’s five Mission Essential Task List, or METL tasks.</i>

The DART concept is old, old, old. The team's first function is on-site band-aid application to try to get the ship flyable enough to limp home; if it's broken beyond that, the team rigs it for extraction by air or truck. 

Our Maintenance Platoon <a href="http://www.162ahc.com/" rel="nofollow"><b>in RVN</b></a> spent as much time slogging around in the paddies as some Infantry outfits, but DART was secondary to their primary mission of fixing broken birds. And in 2001, I rewrote our TF's DART SOP and got an attaboy for it when we were in Boz. 

What's new is that the 101st now has a DART that's got aircraft recovery as a *primary* mission--a DART is usually an <i>ad hoc</i> thing, since all mechanics are trained and briefed on what their duties would be should they be tapped for a recovery. When the siren goes off, Wrenchbender Six picks his team from whoever's available and they launch. In my old ARNG outfit, the DART was a mechanic, a Tech Inspector and (maybe) a test pilot.

My take on this dedicated DART concept? It depends on how many aircraft the 101st has falling out of the sky each week. What's interesting is that the Maje grabbed the ASE folks. ASE stands, not for Aircraft Support Eguipment, btw, but for Aircraft Survivability Equipment--the mechanical and electronic countermeasures suites on the ships. That stuff takes a *lot* of TLC to keep it functional, especially in SWA. So the folks he grabbed are the unit technogeeks, with all that term entails. 

And if they're poking around broken--or shot-down--helicopters, then they're not PMing or testing or repairing the ASE, which, in turn, will lead to more broken or shot-down helicopters. MAJ Crocitto may just have invented the self-generating mission... ]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39498</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39498</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:05:57 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Barb on 2006-01-25</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I can't say that I enjoyed listening to Stein - his form of willful ignorance is incredibly frustrating to listen to.  Hugh treated him much better than he deserve, but then - he is a civil fellow.

Since I listened to the replay of the interview during the 5pm (pacific) hour, I got a bonus, though.  <b><a href="http://strengthandhonor.typepad.com/captaink/" rel="nofollow">Major K</a></b> called in to Hugh's show to discuss his reactions!  That caused me to be a little late to a therapy session with BCR  ;-)  Anyhow, let's just say that he didn't have to describe the steam coming out of Major K's ears - especially regarding Stein's statement that he felt our troops in Iraq died in vain.  ]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39496</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2006/01/military_news_of_note.html#comment-39496</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:24:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


