previous post next post  

I'm Baaack...

Sorry to have been off the net for so long, but I've been focused on switching seats in the airplane I fly. I now have a window and can see out the front. This is good.

I've been watching the fur fly in some many areas (Iran's effort to build its own Nuclear Party Favors to pop over the heads of those pesky Jews (among others), Ted Kennedy sonorous dronings-on about the inherent evil of the President's latest SCOTUS nominee, Joel Stein bearing his MoveOn.org soul, etc., etc.) that it's hard to know where to begin. Moreover, it's somewhat intimidating to come up with something unique, much less, er, profound, on these goings-on. So, lowering my sights to just musing about stuff in general, here's my take...

Nuclear Ayatollahs:

I'm not privy to the Administration's plan to carry out their somewhat veiled threat to prevent Iran from joining the nuclear club, but so far I'm not confident we have the political will or international support to destroy that regime's ability to build a viable nuclear weapons stockpile directly. It would, however, be interesting to overtly (and often) declare our national support to the Iranian Resistance...and back it up with aggressive and sustained support.

Granted, this would be a radical departure from past US behavior, i.e., supporting those who would fight for their freedom, rather than leaving them to the tender mercies of their tyrants, ala, Poppa Bush and the Scowcroft crowd.

But if we could just have the balls to say, "OK, people, you have a choice. Throw the bums out or they are going to put you in a position of watching your minarets melt. This ain't personal, but we think you can understand how we will respond if Ahmadinejad has his way. This is not something we will have to ponder. In fact, our leaders probably won't be given that luxury. Indeed, if a dirty bomb is detonated in a Western country or, worse yet, an actual nuclear detonation occurs, our own citizenry's demands for retribution, swift, terrible retribution, cannot and will not be ignored.

Nuclear products are traceable. The mullahs' fingerprints will be all over the event, making any excuse not to respond to Teheran utterly moot. That said, wasting your collective arses for something we daresay the majority of you probably detest and understandably fear, would be terribly unfair and unjust.

So, stand by for money, guns, cheerleading and muscle. The latter we will happily provide if you need sanctuary. The Iraqis like the idea of a non-threatening border and don't mind us hammering the Iranian Revolutionary Guards' nuts to cream if they so much as look at us funny within an inch of the border. Meanwhile, we think the Europeans are coming around. Really. Stop laughing. Anyway, we're gonna put the squeeze on these guys from a number of fronts--political, economic, informational, and in other ways. But the hard work will be up to you.

Besides, if you fix it, you own the victory. You, no one else, will determine your future. It will cost you dearly in blood but the reward is, well, a future."

Ted on "Alioto" (his pronunciation):

"Ladies and gentlemen, we apologize for this interruption. Senator Specter has called for a 15-minute recess so they we may execute this warrant. Senator Kennedy, you are under arrest for the murder of one Mary Jo Kopechne. You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to have an attorney present now and during any future questioning. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you free of charge if you wish. Gentlemen, again, we apologize for the disturbance. Senator Leahy, you may contact Senator Kennedy through the District federal prosecutor's office. Mr. Kennedy will probably be released on bond--we doubt his own recognizance is prudent--within the hour."

Joel Stein: A Rove plant if there ever was one. Heh.

9 Comments

'Bout time! I was gonna put a hold on that "Beers of the World" deal you get in lieu of pay...
 
John - That's not a credible threat. He can't drink on the job, anyway. It's not like he's still in the Air Force or nuthin'...
 
Dusty - I agree with your concerns, but I'm not sure that the message / approach you describe will be (a) received by the necessary Iranian citizens, or (b) able to counter the kinds of indoctrination the local media of the country feeds it's populace. Check out some of these from the MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute) site on Iran : - Iranian Animated Film for Children Promotes Suicide Attacks - Iran TV Discussion on the Myth of the Gas Chambers and the Truth of Protocols of the Elders of Zion; ‘The Only Solution for This Cancerous Tumor [Israel] is Surgery’ ... etc.
 
I say this whenever I get the chance, slowly working to spread the meme in the hope it gets back to him someday: "You shouldn't be so hard on poor 'ol Teddy. After all, he has to live with being the brother who wasn't worth shooting."
 
Barb, Remember how well indoctrination worked in the Soviet Union? Hint: not very well. Some could say it was effective in Nazi Germany (the closest analogy) but with today's hard-to-control access to the rest of the world and a population less supportinve of its leadership--the bloom is off the rose, as it were, in Iran I think--I think the chances are greater than you may think.
 
It's true that blogging and other Open forms of communication are a potential positive influence (although, heaven help us if they are reading Kos instead of Argghhh!). Then again, look at the whole issue of China shutting down blogs with 'undesirable' content on it. The Blogosphere is somewhat under the radar - but not totally.
 
Dear Iranian Students and Other Dissidents: We've been waiting 10 years for you to get your sh*t together. We don't think that we have 10 more. Less than five at the current estimates for time to build a nuclear weapon. We highly recommend that you get crackin' before we are forced to do so. We have heard from many freedom loving Iranians that they want help, not invasion. Tell us what you need and you'll get it, however, you should be warned that while we would like t adhere to your wishes and not destroy your country, culture and monuments to your thousands of years of history, we cannot wait until madmen have the nuke to act. I'm afraid playing in underground rock bands and wearing pink hijabs with some hair showing is not quite getting it. We respectfully request, as Michael Ledeen says: Faster please. We really do prefer non-violence on our part, contrary to popular belief, but, as a citizen of this country, if the mad Mullahs and Almond Head keep up the pace, it's bombs away and sionora. Yours in friendship and hope of a fine future with huge trade incentives and open diplomatic relationships with a free and democratic Iran, Kat
 
Hi, Dusty, welcome back! Glad you are a little farther away from bad smells in the three-holer. (one of my favorite airplanes to ride in; I remember watching the wing do its origami thing going in and out of Page Field in Fort Myers.) On the Iran-Iraq thing: Well, I think the Neo-Jacobins have led us down the garden path, and others (y'all, the young folks, maybe even poor ol' me, {None of us wants *that*!}) may have to retrieve their chestnuts. Sorry if I may seem incoherent, but I have to type quickly because I turn into a pumpkin at 0200 EST. The sweety has set the parental controls on the router here, and there ain't much I can do, she having root, and a revolver.
 
On Ted - wouldn't the actual charge be "homicide by negligent use of a motor vehicle" rather than murder? :-)
 
© 2008 John Donovan
All rights reserved.