previous post next post  

Fighting Insurgents.

Hmmmm.

Al-Reuters, 21 Dec 05 On December 21, 2005, Al-Qaeda fighters, Ba-athist militiamen, and Sunni Insurgents staged an ambush some three miles from FOB Kearny, in the Sunni Triangle. Ordered to rescue a besieged logistics convoy, Captain William J. Fetterman and 80 soldiers were decoyed over MSR Cheyenne by a small number of Insurgents led by the young jihadi warrior, Abd al-Aziz, into a trap where over 1000 insurgents waited in hiding. Fetterman's pursuit over the MSR, in violation of the ROE, led to the death of his entire command.

The shooting started about noon, and was over by 12:30. Many of the bodies were found by Capt. Ten Eyck that afternoon. They were stipped and mutilated much in the same manner as were the contractors at the Fallujah Bridge earlier.

If that news item were real, can you imagine the calls for disengagement - how we were losing the war and should just pull out?

The clever among have already figured this out. The event described above happened. On this day in 1866, when the US Army of the Plains was fighting a wily enemy on his own turf.

The Fetterman Massacre.

The situations are different, the motivations are different, certainly on our side (though I'm sure Kossacks will snort at that). I'm sure there are those on the insurgent side in Iraq who would comfortably identify with the Cheyenne, Arapaho and Sioux warriors on that cold December morning in 1866.

But if they do - they should perhaps take a good look at where that fight led...

And we know where that victory led... the Wagon Box Fight in 1867, and ultimately, through Little Big Horn to Wounded Knee.

You can't really push this analogy too far. The stakes and motivations are vastly different - but a salient point remains the same: Far better for the insurgents to win their power through the ballot box, by joining the consensus, and helping shape the future - than fight it and lose.

1 Trackbacks

TrackBack this entry at http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-tb.cgi/4989

Mr. Snitch, the host of "Best Posts of 2005" writes, "We're looking for you to tell us about the great posts you've seen this year. At year's end, we'll post links to the best posts we come across." If you think one of my posts has merit, would you ... Read More

8 Comments

There was an excellent article on this battle in the last issue if Armor Magazine. It's well worth the read, if you can lay your hands on it.
 
Not on my subscription list... but mebbe they're online (tappity-tappity). Heh. Nope. Feh. Field Artillery Journal has everything online. What's up with the Treadheads?
 
Responding to your question at Bloggin' Outloud: Only 2. (and yep, blogger html tags are limited :-) no smileys either! But I'll keep plugging away at "KS news in the national spotlight" and someday will attract more. lol But now that I know you're from Leavenworth, I'll post an entry from Argghhh! next Monday! No one escapes my all seeing blog. :wink: Congrats on your top Mil Blog win, btw. (That's why I felt okay about the TB, I do mention you in the post! :-) Have a great Christmas. lgp
 
Misspelled 'Insurgents' in your 'news' clip. :) Soon as I hit that I became highly suspicious. Nice lead-in though. I was starting to think 'A THOUSAND, in ONE PLACE? WHAT AN OPPORTUNITY!!!"
 
MCart - Yeah, kind of along the lines of, "Sir, we're surrounded!" "Perfect. They won't get away *this* time..."
 
Thanks for the reminder about Artillery Journal on line. Am currently in a discussion with some zoomies as to why mortars and bombers are not a replacement for field artie. BTW on the Artillery Journal thingie, there is a magazine reference for treadheads magazine, I clicked it but it is busted. You just can never find a tank when you want one.
 
Those Zoomies are in danger of falling into the trap of "All the wars we'll ever fight will be like the one's we're fighting now." We tried just that - mortars and air only - in Afghanistan. The Zoomies weren't always on-station. And they weren't all weather. And their smallest ordnance was a bit big for danger close. And sometimes the mortars couldn't reach everything. The artillery *is* a seriously diminished branch already. We've eliminated/eliminating the Corps Artillery cannon units - their place is being taken by the Air Force. All we're keeping for long range shooters are the rocket units (which the Air Force *likes* for Air Defense suppression...) But, if we *ever* have to fight in the Korean peninsula, or against someone on the line of Iran, India, Russia, or China - someone with an Air Force and a credible Air Defense system - then there won't be all those planes around, and a few battalion volleys of 155mm will be *very* useful.
 
Just what I told that zoomie. I forgot he don't care he isn't ont he ground. He's back in the gunfighter's club suckin down drinks so he can sober up on oxygen in the morning. BTW just came back from the pawn shop. They still have that Webley MK IV in the showcase for $249.00. Too bad I don't want it.
 
© 2008 John Donovan
All rights reserved.