<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for A little historical stuff for the day...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:58:07 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>A little historical stuff for the day...</title>
            <description>Hey - old airplane guys - izzit me, or is this just a cool picture? A-12 Shrikes in the Phillipines before WWII. Heh. Anti-aircraft gunnery... the hard way. I really find it interesting that they kept their pantel (panoramic telescope, used for laying the gun for direction, &apos;dial sight&apos; to a Commonwealth soldier) on the gun (the thing sticking up in front of the guy crewing the piece). There *is* a way you could use that sight to reflect lead... but a ring-and-bead sight would be better. Last, but not least... ain&apos;t tanks a mighty fine thing? As long as...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 06:49:00 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2005-12-17</title>
            <description>
                Oh yeah the Finns did; but they did not have to load them down with a half-ton of USN-inflicted equipment, nor land them on carriers and distort the living poo out of the landing gear so that it would never again retract all the way. I also seem to recall reading somewhere that the Finns replaced the wings on some of them with wooden replicas made from that excellent Finnish birch plywood and spruce: Much smoother and more efficient, just like an old wooden Mooney or Bellanca.

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36545</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36545</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:55:23 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2005-12-15</title>
            <description>
                Thin walls &apos;round a large bore.  Settle down, tanker-boy...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36443</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36443</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:48:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MajMike on 2005-12-15</title>
            <description>
                thin walls?  you callin me a &quot;needle dick&quot;, dick?

plenty thick enough (in tube ballistics is the crux) and that bit about thermal and bending ---  yeah, what he said!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36442</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36442</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:37:17 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2005-12-15</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[A lot of the Buffs went to Finland. 

And the Finns <a href="http://www.warbirdalley.com/buffalo.htm" rel="nofollow"><b>loved 'em </b></a>...]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36419</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36419</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:59:03 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MCPO Airdale on 2005-12-15</title>
            <description>
                Where, Oh Where is the Brewster Buffalo??
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36415</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36415</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:15:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2005-12-15</title>
            <description>
                Dang! Many thanx for the A-12 pix! I have some drawings of the plane in an old Model Airplane News; always thought it cool-looking if not practical. Had dispensers for light frag bombs between the cockpits, as I recall. These must be the later versions; they started out with big Curtiss liquid-cooled V-12s. That was back when Curtiss-Wright still sorta listened to their engineers (somewhat).  

On that other pic:  Problems of quick slew/traverse and elevating aside, I wonder if the equilibrator and  suchlike homeostatic parts of the piece were up to shooting at that angle. Well, they were trying, I guess, and let the enemy aviators know they were appreciated.

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36390</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36390</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:06:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Mudpuppy1975 on 2005-12-14</title>
            <description>
                Thin tube massave breach and chamber assy. APFSDS-T is out the end of the tube (pipe) at approx 1600 meters per second. The tube is thick enough to withstand the pressure and thin enough not to impart too much gravity induced bending and flexing. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36363</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36363</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:45:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2005-12-14</title>
            <description>
                The absentee ballots I sent to some of the guys in the Sandbox are finally getting here, evidently. The voters have been kind of busy...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36341</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36341</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:31:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Masked Menace© on 2005-12-14</title>
            <description>
                Oh, it&apos;s still counts as neck and neck, but when I voted yesterday, you were behind 20-30 votes.  
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36338</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36338</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:00:19 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2005-12-14</title>
            <description>
                By my accounting... that&apos;s neck and neck.  &apos;Specially since Phil isn&apos;t even trying...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36324</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36324</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:21:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Masked Menace© on 2005-12-14</title>
            <description>
                Hey, as of 9am Central, your up by 5 votes over Intel Dump: 532-527
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36323</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36323</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:02:14 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2005-12-14</title>
            <description>
                Yes, that *is* nicht wahr.

And I don&apos;t care about the interior ballistics... it *still* looks thin!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36321</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36321</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:36:24 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2005-12-14</title>
            <description>
                One of the old airplane guys, checking in.

Oh. &quot;Old&quot; referring to *airplane.*

%$#@! I always get into trouble with those indeterminate adjectives... 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36320</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36320</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:35:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2005-12-14</title>
            <description>
                So, the A-12 &quot;Shrike&quot; is the successor to the A-10, nicht wahr?

As for the barrel thickness on a M1: it&apos;s a smoothbore, thus there is little drag on the projectile, it goes down the barrel faster, thus with reduced pressure, therefore thick barrel walls are unnecessary. Tres simple!

Cheers
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36318</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/12/a_little_historical_stuff_for_the_day.html#comment-36318</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:27:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


