<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Thursday Olio</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:18:31 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Thursday Olio</title>
            <description>Coupla things that struck me today. First up - Tom DeLay and his comments about &quot;Winning the War on Fat in the Federal Budget.&quot; Some of us are not amused. While I am not a fan of Rush Limbaugh&apos;s show (I do generally like his monologues, but once the callers start in, I&apos;m outta there, I can only take so much group-think before my mind wanders), I&apos;ll say that Limbaugh&apos;s explanation is *also* plausible. In fact... I *hope* he&apos;s correct, otherwise I have to conclude that Mr. DeLay was hung-over or otherwise incapacitated. Y&apos;all can decide as you wish. The...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:27:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2005-09-19</title>
            <description>
                Well, actually, under the Stafford Act, the emergency declaration (this is why you go for it EARLY when you&apos;re a Governor) obligates the Feds to 755 of the bill, up to 90% if it&apos;s severe enough.

This is a %90 event, and it&apos;s a statutory bill the Feds are due to pay.

Of course, with that gives them the right to some say in *how* it&apos;s spent.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31993</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31993</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:44:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Sigivald on 2005-09-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Isn't the 'earmark' in question an <i>authorization</i>, not an <i>appropriation</i>?

The former don't spend a cent, last I checked, and while giving it up is a nice gesture, it doesn't actually affect spending anyway. (I mean, there's no guarantee that spending was going to get appropriated, and until then, there's not a cent for it.)]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31990</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31990</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:23:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from ry on 2005-09-19</title>
            <description>
                Well, I do stand by what I said Mr. MacCloud.  There is a double standard on &apos;sensitivity&apos; issues in the US in favor of the democrats, but on the flipside no modern democrat will ever be seen as tough on crime or defense(Whittles &apos;Tribes&apos; essay is a great example of the division and the logic behind why---oh, and I&apos;m a graphite Babe-the-herding-pig.  Not a grey sheepdog, no matter how much I think I am a sheepdog.).  

Ah, we youngsters.  We don&apos;t understand how to play the game entirely yet.  Like young cornerbacks in the NFL.  Speed and reflexes and intesity.  Sigh.  

Why do the PRC students get to have raw nerves?  I dunno.  Considering how Bing-Bing terrorizes Ah-Cheun into saying it&apos;s one big happy China I don&apos;t understand either.  Why what some ecentric gwai-lou who hangs out at Castle Arghhh! has to say on the matter whould matter to a loyal citizen of the Middle Kingdom I have no bloody idea why.  But it did, but it also made the ROC student very happy to see that someone here Stateside cared enough to pay attention to the situation.  
Plus, there&apos;s no explaining to some people either. Actually showing my PI PLA whitepapers available online about how PRC lays claim to &apos;the Three Island Chains&apos; that include the Ryukus and other bits of Japan and the Philippines, and a decent chunk of the Pacific as &apos;territorial waters&apos; to boot, didn&apos;t help.  Just showed I was a right wing nut.  Jeez.  I can&apos;t wait &apos;til I finish.
If anyone&apos;s interested I do get interesting stuff about the Taiwan/PRC situation occasionally--particularly from RAND and a few academics.  Let me know and I&apos;ll pass it along.   
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31971</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31971</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:42:30 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Alan on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                No worry, Ry.  I am exploring very indirectly the state of US politics and the problem of division for division&apos;s sake.   We do it in a series of insults, pokes and cartoon politics references.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31926</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31926</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:59:46 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                Ry - Alan was just in wingnut-baiting... what&apos;s it say that you fell for it?  8^D

That was better than any Hairy Eyeball...

Now, to the important stuff - which RAND study, and how come a PRC student gets to have exposed nerves, anyway?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31925</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31925</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:02:03 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from ry on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                Oi.  Did I mess up again(I really need to just stay under that rock don&apos;t I?)?  Sorry Alan.

You can take the pound of flesh tommorrow(though seeing your ode to Carter on your site I dunno if I should be appologizing ;)).
Seeing as how I&apos;ve already used up my &apos;in trouble for insensitivity&apos; quota for the day.  Got hauled into my PIs office after angering and causing a PRC student to rant for twenty who saw a Rand study I was reading and forwarded to a ROC student.  (That&apos;s a mainland Chinese student going berzerk for something I sent to a Taiwanese student for those who don&apos;t know the difference) It doesn&apos;t help that they share the same lab space.  
Ai ya.
After that my patience for &apos;you evil repbulican bastards, kiss my heiny as penitence&apos; type stuff was a little short.
So, if I went off half cocked, sorry.  You&apos;re second in line, behind Sanger, for kicking my head in, okay?  Or you could just have John teach you the Hairy Eyeball--that tends to keep me under my rock.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31923</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31923</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:36:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[That, you'll have to take up with Chris.

I only get the <b><a href="http://www.fototime.com/D190C631DFB78DA/standard.jpg" rel="nofollow">soft-porn Playboy style</a></b> bunnies...]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31921</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31921</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:19:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MCart on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                I think survivor would be more interesting if the tribal council had to EAT the person voted off...

And all the baggage that entails.. :)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31919</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31919</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:11:14 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Alan on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                I forgot my emoticon!  I can&apos;t believe I forgot my emoticon!  

;-)

There - that must clear up everything.   But I still want a wabbit character in the Kar-toon.  
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31918</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31918</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:20:17 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                You&apos;re right, Alan - so Stop It!

Else we send the RWDS&apos;s after you...

Some people just don&apos;t get your humour, Alan...

Hee.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31917</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31917</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:15:31 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Alan on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                Hey - leave my generalistic abstract cogitations alone!   

You want to selectively slag feel free...but if you  list all legislators who have found themselves and legal problems and it might be worth listening to.  Otherwise that is just enemy-of-the-people divisionist rhetoric, party before nation jingoism.  Shame.  
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31916</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31916</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:49:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from ry on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                No, lets not abstract it a bit.  Let&apos;s keep it very specific--inductive rather than deductive.  

Newt Gingrich--booted for a conflict of interest because he signed a contract with a book company.  HR Clinton--signs similar book deal, yet is still there.
Trent Lott--says something nice about a friend on his b-day and loses his job.  Sen. Byrd, actual Kleagle in the KKK, is the teflon senator on race issues because he&apos;s a dem(even though he also was a dixiecrat just like Lott&apos;s friend).  
Oregon and Utah congressman(R) got the boot in the 90&apos;s for sexual harrasment suits(even though it was consensual the difference in power MADE it harrasment), but for the Playboy in Cheif we get &apos;getting a bj isn&apos;t a crime&apos;.
I&apos;m sorry Alan, but there is a serious double standard at play.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31915</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31915</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:28:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Alan on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                But abstract it a bit.  Is there not an odd thing happening in the last few years where moral wrongs are worse than white collar crimes?   I am quite disgusted, for example, that Martha gets a show after getting out of the slammer.  All the while she claims something like it was a &quot;techicality&quot; - not really bad to lie to an investigator.  Look at DeLay - generally I would suggest the defence to the ethics charges are that these are technical things, not indicative of a plan or wickedness.   But snuggle up to the attractive girl and you are going to hell.  I don&apos;t think of this as a partisan thing so much as a degradation for the rule of law and the courts supported by politicians who attack &quot;trial lawyers&quot; and that sort of thing.  Is that fair?

[I am sure I can think of how to turn this into a reason for the right to eat its own...give me a moment or two...]
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31914</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31914</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:12:24 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Fuzzybear Lioness on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                Notice the words &quot;congressman&quot; and &quot;resign,&quot; Alan.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31913</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31913</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:31:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Alan on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                Err...maybe because getting a bj is not a crime?  
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31912</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31912</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:26:58 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                Feh, Alan.  Name me a democrat politician hounded out of office, or quietly told to go away, in recent memory.

Democrat congressmen boff underage interns or commit adultery, as an example, might get embarassed or *shudder* censured.

Republican congressmen resign or go to jail.

Spare me.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31911</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31911</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:11:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Alan on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                Not by the right.  It is time for them to eat their own.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31910</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31910</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:06:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                If she&apos;s got a nice profile, I can take the bunny.

As for Cheney, c&apos;mon, Alan, you can do better than that.  He&apos;s been caricatured so much he&apos;s old news.

Get creative!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31907</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31907</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:20:09 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Alan on 2005-09-16</title>
            <description>
                Gee - I woke up thinking that was ruder than I meant to be...and I was right?!?!?

You are right about the cartoon.  I think we control the agenda there now.  I want a bunny character introduced.  There has never been a political cartoon of any vlaue which did not have a bunny.   Any make fun of Cheney.  No one is making enough fun of Cheney.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31906</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31906</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 06:37:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2005-09-15</title>
            <description>
                I know that Alan.  The difference is, when your side is in power, you spend all the same money happily, on all the same crap and more, and your constituents are happy about.

When the Right is in power, their constituents grump about it.

And would the Left even suggest the redirection of funds, or rather, just raise taxes... which wouldn&apos;t go down after the issue was resolved... now would they?

And have you been paying attention to the &apos;kartoon&apos; this week?  Muir has been Bush-bashing, if gently.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31904</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31904</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 20:36:02 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Alan on 2005-09-15</title>
            <description>
                Err...the state of your Federal budget has nothing to do with lefties, John - check the results of the last election.  That one was worthy of that Kar-Tooon you run.  Start asking the righties why they are wasting the money and you might actually find someone in a position to make the decision...except...they&apos;ve been making all the decisions that got the budget where it is.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31903</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31903</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:54:27 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2005-09-15</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Hmmm. $941 million bucks for what's essentially a <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/08/09/bridges/index_np.html" rel="nofollow"><b>bridge to nowhere</b></a> might be a start in the right direction.

And it won't throw the ferry crew out of what little work there is...]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31901</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31901</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:59:03 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cricket on 2005-09-15</title>
            <description>
                Don&apos;t watch Survivor television.  I can only stand a little of the Family Worship Center at a time.

Interesing observations about donating.

The governor of GA got the legislature to suspend, for one month, the state&apos;s cut of the gas sales.
That is a whopping .15 a gallon.  87 octane is down to 2.59 a gallon.  That is what he did to give the state a break.  Since no government body ever met a tax they didn&apos;t like, we know at midnight 9-30 it will end.

I wonder what pork they can trim from the budgets to send to Katrina relief.

Thanks for the thought.


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31899</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31899</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:55:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from ry on 2005-09-15</title>
            <description>
                Here&apos;s an idea: ad hoc fed gov&apos;t bonds to use for reconstruction in LA, Mississippi, and other states affected by natural disasters this year.  
Everybody wins(no bait and switch with tax money ten years down the line.)

Survivor:  Wife got me hooked.  The only fun is predicting the outcome from week to week, and commercial break to commercial break based on personality traits of the cast.  We bet pocket lint on it.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31895</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31895</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:23:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Mythilt on 2005-09-15</title>
            <description>
                Here is how you make Survior type shows interesting....take a group of 10 people and a pot of $10 million.  Put them in a nasty environment, maybe similar to current, but harder.  When a person leaves the group (For *any* reason) the pot shrinks. [Going from 10-9 people means that the pot goes from 10,000,000 to 6,750,000, ie. each player only gets 750,000 instead of 1,000,000.]  Here the object is actually to survive, not that anti-survival BS.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31893</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31893</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:07:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2005-09-15</title>
            <description>
                ... except that, as of that date, my regiment still rode into battle, sword in hand. Cavalry, y&apos;know.

Cheers
JMH
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31891</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31891</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:45:39 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4(ret)billt on 2005-09-15</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[A bike path in <i>Newark</i>? It'll take more than two million bucks to dig through all that asphalt and find actual soil... ]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31888</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/09/thursday_olio.html#comment-31888</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:06:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

