previous post next post  

Good morning!

Last night's Irish Stew dinner my Rotary Club put on for a fund raiser went well. We probably raised close to $5K, which goes to our scholarship fund. Which is good, since we give away 5 $1K scholarships... this was the first year I could participate, as previous to this I was usually at Fort Irwin or JFCOM doing "stuff". Banking on long-ago job experience, I'm one of the cooks. Well see today if there were any spikes in food poisoning...

I had eight tickets to sell/giveaway (we pay for 'em - it's a *mostly* guaranteed fund-raiser... I gave mine to single soldiers at Fort Leavenworth, and to prosepective new Rotarian (suck 'em in!).

The 17th Red Ensign Standard is up. Read some militant Canadians - and honor their fallen Mounties.

In other news you might actually be interested in... The UAW relents under pressure from *everybody*.

Interesting, but inconclusive, news from the Pentagon.

The battle continues, regardless of what side you are on - with each side co-opting the other's language.

Some members of Congress don't manage their own finances any better than they manage the budget...

Out with those difficult words and concepts! I gotta admit - to me, God speaks in Elizabethan English... gimme the King James!

Red Simonsen died - those who know, know. If you don't know, you probably don't care, either, except in a general human kindness sense.

Up and coming sailors...

With apologies to the Fighting Peanut...

Not everything proposed, makes it:

ARMORED WARFARE: JCM Killed by Friendly Fire

March 15, 2005: The U.S. Army is canceling its JCM (Joint Common Missile) program, meant to develop a replacement for the Hellfire anti-tank missile. The 108 pound Hellfire , used by helicopters and UAVs, has been in service since 1985, and some 76,000 have been built. The JCM was becoming too expensive, and many officers believed that the existing Hellfire II and heavier (670 pound) Maverick and SDB (250 pound Small Diameter smart Bomb) cover all the missions the services need to handle. The demise of the JCM also spotlights the importance of the guidance systems for missiles, and the ease with which missiles can be upgraded with more effective electronics. The basic design of these older missiles is not likely to change any time soon, and any of the main components (structure, rocket motor, controls, warhead, guidance system) can be upgraded. While the idea of having a common air-to-surface anti-tank missile for all the services was attractive, it simply didn't add up in the end. The navy and air force fighters can use a larger missile, and the Hellfire has gotten a new lease on life via use on small UAVs. JCM, while nice in theory, didn't pan out in practice.

Afghanistan - the war the media doesn't care about - because it's going well... but still, you'd think they'd be all over it, since the Euros have a significant presence there - the subject of a later post today!

AFGHANISTAN: Coalition Casualties Way Down

March 1 5, 2005: Deaths from Taliban and al Qaeda violence are running at about ten a week. This is less than the deaths from warlord gunmen and common criminals. The Sunni Arab media, especially the satellite news networks, do what they can to stress real or imagined abuses against Taliban and al Qaeda captives. This is a classic tactic. When you are losing, try and turn your defeats into crimes being committed by your foe.

March 14, 2005: The Afghan army received the first 83 of 5,160 Ford Ranger 4x4 light trucks. Much cheaper than hummers, and popular in Afghanistan, the vehicles are made in Thailand and sold throughout Asia. The rest of the vehicles will be delivered over the next 18 months.

March 13, 2005: This Summer, the U.S. will pull its troops out of Western Afghanistan. These forces are being replaced by Afghan and NATO troops. The American forces will move to southern and eastern Afghanistan.

March 7, 2005: Over the last year, attacks on coalition forces in Afghanistan have been reduced by more than half. A year ago, there were about a dozen attacks a week, now it's about five. Combat deaths are down to about two a month. Most Taliban and al Qaeda activity now comes from press releases and their web sites, where they proclaim that they will be back.

Now, from the war they do like to cover...

IRAQ: Running Out of Blood Money

March 15, 2005: The Iraqi army and police have a casualty rate over four times that of coalition forces. Amazingly, this has not had any apparent effect on recruiting. While most recruits persist because they need a job, for an increasing number, it's all about revenge. Most soldiers are married men who live at home. When police and soldiers are killed, their neighbors in uniform feel an obligation to get revenge. In Sunni Arab areas, the police often know who is doing the killing. If not the individuals, than the family or clan. That's why the terrorists try to haul their dead away. But enough enemy dead and wounded are found, plus captives from raids, to know which families are hostile. The Iraqi police know how to play the family angle, which to Western eyes is bizarre. For example, if it is clear that the family is behind the attackers, then arresting the head of the family (usually an extended family, often with several dozen members) often gets the attention, and often the
surrender, of the terrorists.

While many Iraqis know a lot of family details, U.S. forces have had to apply their computers and software (genealogy and police stuff, especially) to figure out who is who. This was how Saddam was captured over a year ago, and how an increasing number of terrorist leaders are being tracked down and captured. In the past week, former Saddam bodyguard Marwan Taher Abdul Rashid and his cousin, Abdullah Maher Abdul Rashid (also the brother-in-law of Saddam's son, Qusai), were captured because a family tree was illuminated and shaken. Many members of the extended Saddam clan have been found involved in funding and leading the attacks on the government and coalition troops. Money has been used as a weapon, and the Baath Party/pro-Saddam groups spend over $100,000 for each coalition soldier they kill. Thus the policy against paying ransoms. It's literally blood money. This is especially true because indications are that the terrorists are running into cash flow problems. As the tide turns, many of the terrorist paymasters are shifting their spending to themselves and their families. With war crimes trials now under way, and more Iraqi police out there knocking on doors, paying for dead cops and American soldiers is becoming a dangerous proposition. Too dangerous for a man of means.

While we certainly could have done some things better - all in all, given the circumstances, I think we're doing pretty well. But only time will tell.

Hat tip: Strategy Page.

CAPT H sends along this as suggested reading. A little confused? Read this. Registration required, but the Telegraph is not a spam-monster. Need more?

Cassandra at Villainous Company has all the econ stats you can use, served up hot and spicy by a sexy waitron! But ya really wanna hang around for the pics of the Villainous High School Chick!

Last, but not least - AFSis wants us to know how to shower in a war zone. Been there, done that, thanks! But you FNGs!

13 Comments

...more like the HS dork. Like you never suspected...
 
Jeeze, talk about setting a plate ful o' chow in front of me... UAW: They can play their little muscle flexing games with other folks, but they seem to forget the Marine Corps credo: "To err is human; to forgive devine... Neither is Marine Corps policy." The Corps doesn't have to tread the path of policy review and secure approval from every department head, and collective bargaining attorney: The Commanding Officer says, "No Marine will park here." and that is the end of it. With the supporting infrastructure of Marine vets, as well as our venerable friends in the veteran's community, such foot-shooting spreads like wildfire, with irrecoverable losses... The Language of the Bible: The beauty of the message of the Bible is not only contained in the lessons inferred, but in the structure of the lexicon... "Yea, tho I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, Thou art with me..." packs a helluva lot more punch than, "Even though I travel through dangerous place, I can count on you..." Sorry, I prefer the authorative statement rather than the weakened, politically correct mealy mouthed platitude. God was here first, you learn HIS lexicon, you don't change his words to suit you... Cassie: Derned fine gams there, me proud beauty... No doubt, like a fine wine, ye've gotten better with time... Yowza! Out.
 
Sgt. B., you're a sweetheart. Only a man... I'm still cringing at my dorkitude - it was almost impossible to find me without a book in my hand - that's what I thought was so funny.
 
As "intelligence is the ultimate aphrodesiac*", having a book in your hand simply increases the appreciation... *except for a hot M2 with about a billion rounds of ammo, and they just put brand new targets out in the impact area, and any of a number of Castle beauties showed up in bikinis and want to fire a few rounds from Momma Deuce... *receding into the distance continuing THAT line of thought, followed by snickering scruples...*
 
Sarge - you are spot on about the language of the Bible. The poetry is as powerful as the message. I had the supreme pleasure of meeting a Vietnam Vet named Dave Carey recently when he spoke here in Redmond. He is the author of The Ways We Choose: Lessons for Life from a POW's Experience, and now works as a motivational speaker. During his incarceration in N.Vietnam POW camps, he took solace in the 23rd Psalm as a means to focus his mind, when he feared he was losing it. It was a fantastic experience to meet him - and I found out he grew up in the town next to mine, too!
 
I'm a big fan of the archaic language - I'm an Episcopalian and when then reformed the Book of Common Prayer it darned near killed me. I still love Rite One - the old words are so much more beautiful and more meaningful than the new. I dread the day when I'll walk into a church and hear, "Yo, God... s'up?"
 
God was here first, you learn HIS lexicon, you don't change his words to suit you... - Posted by Sgt B I take it then you read the Bible in the original Hebrew and Greek, since that was God's original lexicon. Or did God screw up by not teaching the Isrealites King James English the first time through? Should Chinese people have to learn King James English so they can read the Bible? The KJV can be incredibly beautiful in it's prose at times, but it can also be a beast to understand, even to english speakers. We have 3 different translations and one paraphrase at home (KJV, NAS, NIV, and The Message). None of these is the end all and be all translation (and I wouldn't consider The Message scripture as much as a *really good* study guide). Sometimes the KJV makes more sense to me, mostly the NIV is easier for me to understand. I get too tangled in the "thee"s and "thou"s and I'm often left with the feeling of "huh?!? what?!?" when reading the KJV. Once I already understand the concept the KJV's language is pretty, but until then it's just pretty much hollow and useless. Shakespear's "Friends, Romans, Countrymen" speach was great rhetorical biting sarcasm, but the first time I read it I couldn't for the life of me understand why everyone was so mad afterwords. Someone had to explain it to me in contemporary language before it made sense. I'm not saying that we should translate Shakespear and toss him aside, but I don't think having *both* available is such a bad thing. I agree with you about things like changing "man" to "human beings" (despite the obviousness of identical intent) and calling it a translation, since the original Hebrew and Greek texts would have used the word Man, not human being (I'll accept it in a paraphrase since it is the intent that is important there). But the original texts didn't use "thine" either, they used the words for "your". It's just that when the KJV was written, "thine" was the contemporary second or third person possesive at that time. While today we consider the KJV beautiful and archaic the KJV was an attempt to create a contemporary language Bible. In 400 years the NIV will be considered archaic as well. With the creation of a new translation (the KJV wasn't the first translation either, there was at least the RC Latin translation preceding it) no one is advocating removal of any of the others. As someone who grew up Baptist and currently is Presbyterian (EPC not PCUSA) I don't stand much on ceremony. I think God would much prefer "Yo God... 'sup" than not talking to him at all. If the ceremony and language helps you connect with God, Great, there are many wonderful Churches that do that. Me, I find it a distraction from God, so I found a church that wouldn't distract me.
 
Masked, Okay, you got me there. I wish I COULD read HIS words in the original text. But as a student of the Bard, I don't get thrown by "thee"s and "thou"'s. I like the Auld English version for the strength of the words. "Thou SHALL NOT..." seems to impart an authority that is removed, higher, than a gentle parental "Don't DO that..." My God (and I hope yours as well) is a kind and loving god, but I do need him to put his finger in my face and swat me with a rolled up newspaper from time to time, and the auld words bring me comfort, and perspective. I suppose what I really lament is the fact that, instead of making students learn the material, the material is being changed to suit the students. We have seen this in other venues, with miserable results. (How many kids today can rattle off all of the Presidents, or name the works of Mark Twain beyond the books he has written. But, I agree with your statement. I, too, would rather hear "S'up, God?" than silence. (In fact, some of my best conversations with the Lord take place in the cab of my truck, as I drive to work in the morning, and the conversations occur in the modern lexicon, and sometimes get kinda earthy. God's cool, He understands, and He sends me wonderful sunrises every morning, just to let me know that He's there.) Cheers!
 
...as for me... if I had to be stoned, I should like to have first been thoroughly stoned. [whiz-thump] OW! Leave off; we haven't started yet!! heh
 
'showering in a war zone'... Jeez, that guy bitches a lot for having such a decent arrangement. If my scanner was working I'd post a pic of my gunner taking a field shower in Germany in '78. Granted, not a war zone as such- and I'd have to blur out a certain part of the pic- but a lot more primitive. Field hygiene- sometimes it hurts!
 
I absolutely agree we shouldn't be watering down the content, but I don't see much difference in strength between You Shall Not... and Thou Shalt Not... while I see a major difference in You really shouldn't... or You aren't supposed to.... In any translation I'll argue vehemently against the latter and I'll be unconcerned about the former. Paraphrases are a different matter as they don't pretend to be canonical scripture, just a rough presentation as to what is going on which can be rather helpful considering the huge detachment from their culture. (The "Turn the other cheek" line isn't about how to respond to physical violence but to an insult.)
 
It would only be time until the Good Book would be sanitized and neutered by the PC Police. About 15 years ago they shookdown Mother Goose out of any heartfelt meaning. They transformed Jill into a Femithug, and hade her push Jack's wheelchair up the hill; for in their world all males were spinless whimps. What was riotous, was that it was written with a straight face and presented as a new more equitable Modern Mother Goose (I'm sure that Jill had a lesbian relationship with Miss Muffet - but I can't prove that).
 
JCM canx ---- Thank the gods!!!! If I heard one more brief where someone told me that in the future I or someone I ordered to was going to have to engage a surface contact with a JCM instead of the already so-so Maverick, I was going to pop a vein. The poundage of "boom" they were putting in that JCM was a joke, and the range on it was a farm-buyer. Good riddance. Now about the Harpoon divestiture....
 
© 2008 John Donovan
All rights reserved.