<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for The new 6.8mm Spec Ops round.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:30:07 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>The new 6.8mm Spec Ops round.</title>
            <description>Before I launch into this discussion - I reload now and again, but it&apos;s vanilla, using standard data. I gunsmith, but I&apos;m not a designer, I&apos;m a repairer of milsurp (hell, anything, if you ask me to), nor do I do custom work. I&apos;m looking at starting to build my own guns - but they will be older guns, originals of which are unobtainable with my projected lifetime income, and the ones available shouldn&apos;t be shot, anyway. I&apos;m talking hand gonnes, wheelocks, matchlocks, etc. There are several manufacturers out there who will provide castings and forgings, rough finished stocks and...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:03:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Head on 2005-01-13</title>
            <description>
                Robarm&apos;s new XCR is looking interesting, offered in 6.8 makes it more so. I have a little bit of trouble parting with the cash they ask for, but they are one of the few designing new, US semiautos and seem to have a following.

Great read, good luck with the rifle building aspirations. I am a lowly AK builder myself, but the sense of accomplishment is all the same.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11616</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11616</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:33:17 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4billt on 2005-01-13</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Glad you included the Ferguson on the list--talk about historically significant (and not just because it was a "first").

If Major Pat had been less of a gentleman and had popped George Washington in the back, as he <i>didn't</i> do, just think of the course history may have taken--as in, Horatio Gates as C-in-C of the Continental Army. Shudder. ]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11612</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11612</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:20:48 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Sigivald on 2005-01-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.midwayusa.com/rewriteaproduct/375670" rel="nofollow">Midway</a> has a DPMS upper for about 600 bucks.

I've seen 'em in Shotgun News for less, from other makers (and of course in other sizes and styles).

Scary, innit?]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11587</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11587</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:26:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2005-01-12</title>
            <description>
                Sigh.  I really didn&apos;t want to know that...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11574</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11574</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:04:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Heartless Libertarian on 2005-01-12</title>
            <description>
                I&apos;ve seen several manufacturers offering 6.8mm uppers as well as complete rifles/carbines.

The most advertised is Barrett&apos;s M468.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11573</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11573</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:53:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2005-01-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Well, GEBIV - you might have to pack your bags.

It's <b><a href="http://www.therifleshoppe.com/complete_parts_sets.htm" rel="nofollow">on the list</a></b>.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11568</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11568</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:38:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from GEBIV on 2005-01-12</title>
            <description>
                Let me know if you are ever building your own Ferguson Breechloading Rifle. I might travel out to the armory and build one alongside you. I&apos;ve been in love with that gun ever since I discovered Louis L&apos;Amour as a kid.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11567</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11567</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:34:58 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4billt on 2005-01-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I've always felt that the primary purpose of a pistol was as trading material for a <i>real</i> gun. The M-14 didn't last for the same reason the M1911 didn't--it suddenly dawned on the bean-counters that they could ship umpty-scads of 9mm/5.56mm rounds in the same volume as a mere scad of .45 ACP/7.62mm. A shame, because the M-14 <i>with</i> selector switch gives you some nice options at ranges in excess of 700 meters.

But, if I have my druthers, I'll take rockets (okay, it's a zen thing--"Become one with the rocket, then one with the target. Then--<i>touch</i>!")

Gratuitous disclaimer: Mister Chairman, I am not now, nor have I ever been, involved with chipping my own flints.



]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11540</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2005/01/the_new_68mm_spec_ops_round.html#comment-11540</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:01:51 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

