<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Regarding the mess of the Canadian Submarines.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/regarding_the_mess_of_the_canadian_submarines.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/11/regarding_the_mess_of_the_canadian_submarines_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:06:16 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Regarding the mess of the Canadian Submarines.</title>
            <description>I wondered if the ex-Upholder class submarines acquired by Canada came with a warranty. This is a response I got in email: Couple of points: 1. HMCS Chicoutimi was HMS Upholder, and Upholder was the first of the class, and did the trials. No 2 boat began trials but these were stopped by the decision to keep only SSNs in commission.The other two subs were mothballed immediately after launch. 2. On decommissioning, Upholder was tied along side at Gosport (the sub base west of Portsmouth) to allow potential purchasers to visit. I saw her there on a visit to the...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/regarding_the_mess_of_the_canadian_submarines.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/regarding_the_mess_of_the_canadian_submarines.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 11:13:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from L. Thomas Martin on 2004-11-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[For a survey of several studies of the declining capabilities of the Canadian forces, see <a href="http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/shared/readmore.asp?sNav=pb&id=632" rel="nofollow">Canada's Military Posture: An Analysis of Recent Civilian Reports</a>. See also <a href="http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/shared/readmore.asp?sNav=pb&id=663" rel="nofollow">Fraser Forum (May 2004): Defending Canada</a>.

Disclaimer: I work for the Institute publishing the studies.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/regarding_the_mess_of_the_canadian_submarines.html#comment-8471</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/regarding_the_mess_of_the_canadian_submarines.html#comment-8471</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 01:20:56 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Smoke Eater on 2004-10-08</title>
            <description>
                I just have to ask, WHERE DID YOU FIND THAT (er, uh) hamster, gerbil, rat, whatever, I WANT ONE!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/regarding_the_mess_of_the_canadian_submarines.html#comment-7386</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/regarding_the_mess_of_the_canadian_submarines.html#comment-7386</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 02:36:48 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


