<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for A little more about the CETS.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/a_little_more_about_the_cets.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/11/a_little_more_about_the_cets_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:06:01 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>A little more about the CETS.</title>
            <description>Today the Armorer is going to go to Andersonville. Before I head out, however, I thought I would clean up a loose end regarding the Cost Effective Targeting System (CETS) that I mentioned in a previous post. Dave, the Heartless Libertarian and serving soldier, makes this comment to that post: Looks like a neat and potentially very useful system. One thing I&apos;d do, (besides painting it green/tan): put some sort of protective covering on it. Not bullet/shrapnel proof, just something to protect it when PVT Snuffie bangs his rifle/web gear/elbow on it, so it&apos;s not knocked off zero. Well, as...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/a_little_more_about_the_cets.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/a_little_more_about_the_cets.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2004 09:36:36 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Montieth on 2004-11-01</title>
            <description>
                Re the targeting sensors. Perhaps a wide base with some kind of spherical metal guard around it? Low hanging branches and dense foliage is something that one tends to ignore when trying to get to a good spotting position. More hardened gear is highly preferred. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/a_little_more_about_the_cets.html#comment-8169</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/a_little_more_about_the_cets.html#comment-8169</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:37:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2004-10-30</title>
            <description>
                Sorry I missed you!  Would have been fun to have a tour guide!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/a_little_more_about_the_cets.html#comment-8124</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/a_little_more_about_the_cets.html#comment-8124</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2004 20:38:25 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Mike Lech on 2004-10-30</title>
            <description>
                Doh!! I live in Andersonville!! Would have been nice to have met you there...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/a_little_more_about_the_cets.html#comment-8113</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/10/a_little_more_about_the_cets.html#comment-8113</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:17:14 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


