<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Light-Heavy Doctrine conflicts -- Redux</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/lightheavy_doctrine_conflicts_redux.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Light-Heavy Doctrine conflicts -- Redux</title>
            <description>(N.B. - since SWWBO asked, others may too - CAS is Close Air Support, ALO is Air Liasion Officer, a Zoomie trapped with grunts) It doesn&apos;t take long to discover that prudence isn&apos;t one of my strong points. But right now I don&apos;t have the same constraints John faces. Plus, I think the discussion is an interesting one and invite others to weigh in...it may help someone, somewhere who&apos;s nugging through trying to reinvent the Army. By the way, for all our faults, in all the Services, you&apos;d be surprised how much we are learning organizations...not perfect, and often the...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/lightheavy_doctrine_conflicts_redux.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/lightheavy_doctrine_conflicts_redux.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:45:14 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
    </channel>
</rss>


