<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/lightheavy_doctrine_conflicts.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2012://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.2604-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Light-Heavy Doctrine conflicts.</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.2604</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/lightheavy_doctrine_conflicts.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2604" title="Light-Heavy Doctrine conflicts." />
    <published>2004-08-30T01:57:29Z</published>
    <updated>2006-11-11T16:52:49Z</updated>
    <title>Light-Heavy Doctrine conflicts.</title>
    <summary>Since my work is directly involved in this, I&apos;m not going to comment, for personal and professional reasons. But Jason over at IraqNowBlog has an interesting post discussing a NYT article that questions the way the Army is trying to take it&apos;s doctrine. I find Jason&apos;s arguments as interesting as I find the NYT article, well, lacking perspective. Jason&apos;s perspective is informed by his experiences in Iraq, and are worth the read. Yeah, I have opinions, but since I&apos;m paid to have these opinions, I&apos;ll have to figure out a way to express them without compromising my job. Right now,...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>The Armorer</name>
      <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Observations on things Military" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Since my work is directly involved in this, I'm not going to comment, for personal and professional reasons.</p>

<p>But Jason over at <a href="http://iraqnow.blogspot.com/2004/08/light-heavy-doctrine.html"><b>IraqNowBlog has an interesting post</b></a> discussing a NYT article that questions the way the Army is trying to take it's doctrine.</p>

<p>I find Jason's arguments as interesting as I find the NYT article, well, lacking perspective.  Jason's perspective is informed by his experiences in Iraq, and are worth the read.  Yeah, I have opinions, but since I'm paid to have these opinions, I'll have to figure out a way to express them without compromising my job.  Right now, that doesn't look possible.</p>

<p>Dusty may or may not weigh in with a comment here, as he's been having an email exchange with Jason on the post.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  
</feed>


