<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Gotta Love it!</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:06:48 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Gotta Love it!</title>
            <description>...when readers provide you Gun P0rn. And of a type that will keep a certain subset of readers happy, too! Click the pic for high-res. One of the cooler-looking of the untested-in-combat tanks: Sweden&apos;s S-Tank, or Stridsvagn 103. By the way, tank fans. Give this place a visit. Doug&apos;s Heavy Metal Gallery. Hat tip - frequent commenter Monteith!...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:59:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2004-08-28</title>
            <description>
                Interestingly, those bars on the bow were not seen in public until about 5-6 years ago (my guess) as they are intended to &apos;ward off&apos; shaped-charge munitions.

Some points about the S-Tank:
1.  Technically it&apos;s a tank-destroyer vice a tank;
2.  The powerpack is twin engined: originally a RR diesel (B-series) for general mobility, and a Boeing gas turbine cuts in for high power requirements/sprinting;
3.  The gon is fixed in the hull and has an autoloader with dual 24 (?) round magazines;
4.  Aiming is via two systems:
     a. elevation by suspension: hydropneumatic which the first and fourth suspension units are raised/lowered to change the fore-aft agle of the hull;
     b. traverse by turning the hull using the steering motor in the transmission;
5.  Three-man crew: crew commander, driver and radio operator. The driver is also the gunner, and the CC has a back/over-ride gun-control. the rad-op face rear and can drive the S-Tank in reverse, ie the vehicle can reverse as fast as it can advance.
6.  While the S-Tank has not been &apos;battle-tested&apos;, the hull configuration, based on WW2 data, is replicated by the Merkava. Its major defect is how well it can shot on the move, ie, its tank-likeness. Evidently, the Swedish Army intended the S-Tank as a high-mobility anti-tank weapon and its defects in the tank attack role were secondary. Despite the enthusiasm for shooting-on-the-move, at long range, accuracy is enhanced by being stationary (even for a short period: shooting from the halt); it is at reletively short range (c.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html#comment-6289</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html#comment-6289</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 20:52:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Montieth on 2004-08-28</title>
            <description>
                iirc, that&apos;s Alan Cors&apos; daughter. She drives a lot of the armor. I also have photo&apos;s of her driving the freshly restored M5 Stuart.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html#comment-6281</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html#comment-6281</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 11:17:14 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2004-08-27</title>
            <description>
                I just looked at the pic closely.  

I think I like the TC.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html#comment-6266</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html#comment-6266</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:09:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


