<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it_atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2012://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.2584-</id>
  <updated>2012-03-24T16:06:48Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Gotta Love it!</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.2584</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2584" title="Gotta Love it!" />
    <published>2004-08-27T15:59:38Z</published>
    <updated>2006-11-11T16:52:49Z</updated>
    <title>Gotta Love it!</title>
    <summary>...when readers provide you Gun P0rn. And of a type that will keep a certain subset of readers happy, too! Click the pic for high-res. One of the cooler-looking of the untested-in-combat tanks: Sweden&apos;s S-Tank, or Stridsvagn 103. By the way, tank fans. Give this place a visit. Doug&apos;s Heavy Metal Gallery. Hat tip - frequent commenter Monteith!...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>The Armorer</name>
      <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Gun Pr0n - A Naughty Expose&apos; of the fiddly bits" />
    
    <category term="Observations on things Military" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>...when readers provide you Gun P0rn.  And of a type that will keep a certain subset of readers happy, too!</p>

<p><a href="http://www.fototime.com/0444234C687DD2F/orig.jpg"><img src="http://www.fototime.com/0444234C687DD2F/standard.jpg" width=500 height=666 border=3></a></p>

<p>Click the pic for high-res.</p>

<p>One of the cooler-looking of the untested-in-combat tanks:  Sweden's S-Tank, or <a href="http://cidwebs.com/armorinscale/referencesstank2.htm"><b>Stridsvagn 103</b></a>.</p>

<p>By the way, tank fans.  Give this place a visit.  <a href="http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/lsm/dhmg/"><b>Doug's Heavy Metal Gallery</b></a>.</p>

<p>Hat tip - frequent commenter Monteith!</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.2584-comment:6289</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.2584" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html#comment-6289" />
    <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2004-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>J.M. Heinrichs</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        Interestingly, those bars on the bow were not seen in public until about 5-6 years ago (my guess) as they are intended to &apos;ward off&apos; shaped-charge munitions.

Some points about the S-Tank:
1.  Technically it&apos;s a tank-destroyer vice a tank;
2.  The powerpack is twin engined: originally a RR diesel (B-series) for general mobility, and a Boeing gas turbine cuts in for high power requirements/sprinting;
3.  The gon is fixed in the hull and has an autoloader with dual 24 (?) round magazines;
4.  Aiming is via two systems:
     a. elevation by suspension: hydropneumatic which the first and fourth suspension units are raised/lowered to change the fore-aft agle of the hull;
     b. traverse by turning the hull using the steering motor in the transmission;
5.  Three-man crew: crew commander, driver and radio operator. The driver is also the gunner, and the CC has a back/over-ride gun-control. the rad-op face rear and can drive the S-Tank in reverse, ie the vehicle can reverse as fast as it can advance.
6.  While the S-Tank has not been &apos;battle-tested&apos;, the hull configuration, based on WW2 data, is replicated by the Merkava. Its major defect is how well it can shot on the move, ie, its tank-likeness. Evidently, the Swedish Army intended the S-Tank as a high-mobility anti-tank weapon and its defects in the tank attack role were secondary. Despite the enthusiasm for shooting-on-the-move, at long range, accuracy is enhanced by being stationary (even for a short period: shooting from the halt); it is at reletively short range (c.
    </content>
    <published>2004-08-29T01:52:42Z</published>
    <updated>2004-08-29T01:52:42Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.2584-comment:6281</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.2584" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html#comment-6281" />
    <title>Comment from Montieth on 2004-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Montieth</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        iirc, that&apos;s Alan Cors&apos; daughter. She drives a lot of the armor. I also have photo&apos;s of her driving the freshly restored M5 Stuart.
    </content>
    <published>2004-08-28T16:17:14Z</published>
    <updated>2004-08-28T16:17:14Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.2584-comment:6266</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.2584" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/gotta_love_it.html#comment-6266" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2004-08-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        I just looked at the pic closely.  

I think I like the TC.
    </content>
    <published>2004-08-28T01:09:01Z</published>
    <updated>2004-08-28T01:09:01Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
</feed>


