<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Castle Argghhh!&apos;s newest acquisition.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:06:49 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Castle Argghhh!&apos;s newest acquisition.</title>
            <description>Since the Castle is supporting 1.5 kids in college, high-end items remain on the wish list and not in the pipeline. While reasons of frugality (and, okay, debt service) have scaled back operations, the mailman or BBT (Big Brown Truck) does still make the occasional delivery. This arrived yesterday. Anybody out there know what it is? Click the pic for high res. Another view is here....</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 06:12:30 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Tim on 2004-08-28</title>
            <description>
                How about a shell for either a 3&quot; ordance rifle or a parrot gun.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6284</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6284</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:55:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Paulie at The Commons on 2004-08-27</title>
            <description>
                Looks like a WWII-vintage 90 or 105 mm tank main gun penetrator round, maybe British, since my examples of the US version have rifling on the aft end.  Maybe 50s era recoilless rifle.  

Looks like a fuze plug at the top, definitely a coupling ring at the bottom, so I think I&apos;m okay.

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6263</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6263</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:16:11 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Sir Knight on 2004-08-27</title>
            <description>
                I know..I know....that there is one of them thingies that them there alaskans use in the pipe line to get rid of clogs, yep 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6261</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6261</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:07:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cw4billt on 2004-08-27</title>
            <description>
                It&apos;s a dummy round--check the diameter and you&apos;ll get an idea of the tube it went with, i.e., field artillery or naval gun. it&apos;s too stubby to be a tank round. Best guesses are it was either used for
1. gun drills with dry-firing (check the wear pattern around the body) or
2. it incorporated a sub-caliber device for using the tube in an anti-marmot role... 

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6255</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6255</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:16:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Montieth on 2004-08-27</title>
            <description>
                I&apos;d say it looks like a 2 pounder projectile but with out something for scale and the lack of markings on it makes it hard to tell. If it&apos;s a 2 pounder it&apos;s missing the driving band as well. Perhaps a demilled 2 Pounder HE shell?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6244</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6244</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:25:48 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from gunner on 2004-08-27</title>
            <description>
                The indentation on the bottom makes it look like a shell, but it does not seem right. Also the fact that the photo does not show the bottom well. So here goes.
Either a dummy practice round, or a decorative shell that is hollowed out for liquor.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6243</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6243</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:42:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Mythilt on 2004-08-27</title>
            <description>
                I&apos;m pulling this out of my lower oriface, but it looks to me like that is either a dummy round or a round that uses seperate powder rather than a cartrage.  My guess is that it is a round from a ships cannon or similar, where the round is placed in the breach and bags of powder are placed behind it.  But I&apos;m not really conversant in ammo or milstuff, so it is a major WAG.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6242</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6242</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:20:54 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Sergeant Major V on 2004-08-27</title>
            <description>
                Tank main gun round?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6239</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/08/castle_argghhhs_newest_acquisition.html#comment-6239</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:57:51 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


