<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Proof - photos of Armed Canadians (not in the service)</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:08:55 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Proof - photos of Armed Canadians (not in the service)</title>
            <description>An Armed Canadian in the Wild! Dr. Funk did pick up that Czech rifle we talked about a while ago. And took it out and used it! And took pictures. And posted &apos;em. Some people in Ottawa are probably besides themselves. One can only hope, anyway!...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:53:25 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Dr_Funk on 2004-02-21</title>
            <description>
                Well, the few rounds I have are head stamped 1938. One would really expect rounds that old to have an elevated rate of failure.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html#comment-2332</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html#comment-2332</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:51:58 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2004-02-21</title>
            <description>
                And what you do find isn&apos;t all that reliable, either.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html#comment-2329</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html#comment-2329</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:44:09 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Dr_Funk on 2004-02-21</title>
            <description>
                That is the rifle, yes. But I haven&apos;t bought it yet. Those pictures were taken in 1989, if I remember correctly. My friend and I went out shooting with it and the M22. Had a blast too. I could take some pictures of my current rifle, if you&apos;d like. Its an old one too, the M95 Austrian cavalry carbine. Nice rifle, but hard to find ammunition for.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html#comment-2327</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html#comment-2327</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:10:12 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


