<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service_atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.1383-</id>
  <updated>2008-08-03T17:43:29Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Proof - photos of Armed Canadians (not in the service)</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.1383</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1383" title="Proof - photos of Armed Canadians (not in the service)" />
    <published>2004-02-21T17:53:25Z</published>
    <updated>2006-11-11T16:52:31Z</updated>
    <title>Proof - photos of Armed Canadians (not in the service)</title>
    <summary>An Armed Canadian in the Wild! Dr. Funk did pick up that Czech rifle we talked about a while ago. And took it out and used it! And took pictures. And posted &apos;em. Some people in Ottawa are probably besides themselves. One can only hope, anyway!...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>The Armorer</name>
      <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Gun Rights" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://canadianfunk.blogspot.com/2004_02_08_canadianfunk_archive.html#107681482849542609">Armed Canadian</a> in the Wild!</p>

<p>Dr. Funk did pick up that Czech rifle we talked about a while ago.  </p>

<p>And took it out and used it!</p>

<p>And took pictures.  And posted 'em.  Some people in Ottawa are probably besides themselves.  One can only hope, anyway!</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.1383-comment:2332</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.1383" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html#comment-2332" />
    <title>Comment from Dr_Funk on 2004-02-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dr_Funk</name>
        <uri>http://canadianfunk.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://canadianfunk.blogspot.com">
        Well, the few rounds I have are head stamped 1938. One would really expect rounds that old to have an elevated rate of failure.
    </content>
    <published>2004-02-21T23:51:58Z</published>
    <updated>2004-02-21T23:51:58Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.1383-comment:2329</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.1383" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html#comment-2329" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2004-02-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        And what you do find isn&apos;t all that reliable, either.
    </content>
    <published>2004-02-21T23:44:09Z</published>
    <updated>2004-02-21T23:44:09Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.1383-comment:2327</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2004://1.1383" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2004/02/proof_photos_of_armed_canadians_not_in_the_service.html#comment-2327" />
    <title>Comment from Dr_Funk on 2004-02-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dr_Funk</name>
        <uri>http://canadianfunk.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://canadianfunk.blogspot.com">
        That is the rifle, yes. But I haven&apos;t bought it yet. Those pictures were taken in 1989, if I remember correctly. My friend and I went out shooting with it and the M22. Had a blast too. I could take some pictures of my current rifle, if you&apos;d like. Its an old one too, the M95 Austrian cavalry carbine. Nice rifle, but hard to find ammunition for.
    </content>
    <published>2004-02-21T23:10:12Z</published>
    <updated>2004-02-21T23:10:12Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
</feed>

