Archive Logo.jpg

April 26, 2006

Dumb Question...

Is it me, or has the English language been hijacked again by the MSM and the Usual Suspects in the Democrat Pahty, to wit:

"Record Profits" by the oil companies.

Sounds more to me like record revenues. I think there's a difference...and a substantial meaning. If your product costs more to produce and you pass most (if not all) of that cost on to the consumer--something that's perfectly legal, fair and increases your chances of staying in business--you're going to take in more cash, yes? But if production costs are up due to increases in raw material cost (crude) why would your profits go up?

Or am I missing something? Tell me...


P.S. For every gallon sold, the average profit is 9 CENTS (that's 3% profit if that gallon cost you an even 3 bucks...oooooooo!).
P.P.S. For every dollar spent on getting your petrol to market, here's the cost breakdown (these are ConocoPhillips numbers):
Crude: 58 cents
Taxes: 20 cents
Refining: 15 cents
Marketing and distribution: 7 cents