You may have noticed my silence on the recent twists in the Kerry Medal saga.
I know enough about the military decoration system to know that the 'senior signature' and many times the 'junior signature' on medal citations are not originals, but are either done by pantograph, or in the case of some of the relatively high volume awards, pre-printed.
I also know there is no such thing as a Silver Star with V. The V device is added to an award when it is an award that is most commonly awarded for routine performance recognition, such as Army Achievement Medals, Army Commendation Medals, and Meritorious Service Medals to distinguish them visually as heroism awards.
A Bronze Star, for example, without a V device, is essentially an MSM awarded for good general performance in a combat zone - meaning that you did your job well in a hostile fire zone. Put a V on it, and it changes to the 4th-highest award for valor.
As I have said before, I accept Kerry's medals at face value. But the weight of evidence is starting to change that.
Each and every thing laid out about his medals is explainable in an innocent sense (with the possible exception now of that 1st Purple Heart). If I were to lose a medal citation, I can ask the Army to issue a new one - and they will, after the requisite proofs are obtained, and it will have the signature of the current guy signing those particular medals. So, Kerry can have a Silver Star cite, for example, with Lehman's signature on it, and in and of itself it just means a replacement citation was issued, and Lehman wouldn't know about it. But what eats into that argument are the multiple wordings of the citations - that indicates at best record-keeping problems, to self-serving rewrites, to outright attempts to rewrite the record.
What it boils down to is this... just about every fault thus posited about Kerry's medals has an explanation. But the Job-like cluster of just about every fault in the system to reside in one guys record begins to gather a momentum to support the view that the record has been manipulated. And since Kerry is alive - all the requests for those changes had to have his signature on them.
If there is no chicanery, John Kerry just used up his statistical luck on being the one guy who's whose [I hate it when I do that, I really am literate] records contain virtually every form of goof there can be. Which doesn't bode well for his chances at the lottery - and hopefully for his chances at the Presidency with them.
"... to outright attempts to rewrite the record." Perhaps 'putative' vice 'outright'?
The background of the Silver Star citation(s) needs to be examined more thoroughly, for example. As well, following-up on the quoted comments concerning Senator Kerry's Bronze Star Medal award ("I didn't know about it until last year" (paraphrase)). Query: was it a BSM or a BSM with "V"?
The problem with gallantry awards is that they recognise one-time accomplishments: the Audy Murphy types are rare. If one is to use a (for example, Bronze Star Medal with "V") award as a personal citation of behavior, I would expect previous or subsequent actions to bear out the citation. In this regard, I would follow through with your point on Senator Kerry's departure from Vietnam after 4+ months vice 12 (or 6) month norm. It does not fit the expected norm for a junior officer of the VN war, or any historical other period.
More to the point, I understand he requested reassignment on the basis of his PHs. That's not representative of the behavior I was taught as a subordinate/junior officer. (As an aside, roughly 75% of my early education as an officer was from SnrNCOs. And after 20+years, I still pay attention to them.)
As for Senator Kerry's wartime service in general: he left the 'Gridley" before he was fully qualified as a Watch officer; he then left the Swift Boats after 4+ months, what was he rated as qualified during that period? I spent 4 months in command of my troop (platoon for y'all) before my Troop Warrant (Platoon Sergeant) thought I was no longer a threat to the Troop, and therefor could issue proper orders. Given wartime conditions, such should happen sooner, but I am not convinced by the accounts of Senator Kerry's service that he had achieved that level of trustworthiness, or command rating (was he qualified to lead an operation, and to what level).
Since Decision Day Nov 04 does not affect me directly, I am Babbling ...
Cheers
JMH
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S> |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 |

Prev | List | Random | Next Powered by RingSurf! |
|
|